The DOI matches its Crossref record; 66 of the 66 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Philanthropy, Integration or Innovation? Exploring the Financial and Societal Outcomes of Different Types of Corporate Responsibility
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
(1994) · Journal of the American Dietetic Association · doi:10.1016/0002-8223(94)92216-0 · Cited by 45,910
A Three-Dimensional Conceptual Model of Corporate Performance
Carroll, A. B. (1979) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/257850 · Cited by 10,480
Corporate Social and Financial Performance: A Meta-Analysis
Orlitzky, M., Schmidt, F. L., & Rynes, S. L. (2003) · Organization Studies · doi:10.1177/0170840603024003910 · Cited by 7,641
Strategy and society: the link between competitive advantage and corporate social responsibility
(2007) · Strategic Direction · doi:10.1108/sd.2007.05623ead.006 · Cited by 7,410
Globalization and Its Discontents
(2015) · The SAGE Encyclopedia of Economics and Society · doi:10.4135/9781452206905.n316 · Cited by 5,477
Misery Loves Companies: Rethinking Social Initiatives by Business
Margolis, J. D., & Walsh, J. P. (2003) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/3556659 · Cited by 5,130
Corporate Social Performance Revisited
Wood, D. J. (1991) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/258977 · Cited by 5,093
Corporate Social Responsibility Theories: Mapping the Territory
Garriga, E., & Melé, D. (2004) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1023/b:busi.0000039399.90587.34 · Cited by 3,968
Green and competitive: ending the stalemate
(1995) · Long Range Planning · doi:10.1016/0024-6301(95)99997-e · Cited by 3,848
Bad Management Theories Are Destroying Good Management Practices
Ghoshal, S. (2005) · Academy of Management Learning & Education · doi:10.5465/amle.2005.16132558 · Cited by 3,813
Cited by
Corporate social responsibility and developing countries
Dobers, P., & Halme, M. (2009) · Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management · doi:10.1002/csr.212 · Cited by 438
Self-citationCorporate responsibility: Reflections on context and consequences
Halme, M., Roome, N., & Dobers, P. (2009) · Scandinavian Journal of Management · doi:10.1016/j.scaman.2008.12.001 · Cited by 123
Self-citationCSR initiative characteristics and employee engagement: An impact-based perspective
Opoku‐Dakwa, A., Chen, C. C., & Rupp, D. E. (2018) · Journal of Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1002/job.2281 · Cited by 111
Turunen, L. L. M., & Halme, M. (2021) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126605 · Cited by 101
Self-citationAccountability in the Social Economy: The Case of Private Social Solidarity Institutions
Ferreira, A., Santos, C., Inácio, H., Costa, A. J., Bandeira, A. M., Tomé, B., Joaquim, C., Góis, C., Curi, D., Meira, D., et al. (2022) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su14031147 · Cited by 3
Metadata
- Authors
- Halme, M., & Laurila, J.
- Venue
- Journal of Business Ethics
- Published
- 2008-04-04
- Volume
- 84
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 325-339
- ISSN
- 0167-4544 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-0697
- OpenAlex
- W1999843330
- Cited by
- 340
- References
- 66
- FWCI
- 40.73
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Philanthropy, Integration or Innovation? Exploring the Financial and Societal Outcomes of Different Types of Corporate Responsibility. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/s10551-008-9712-5
- The paper
- Halme, M., & Laurila, J. (2009). Philanthropy, Integration or Innovation? Exploring the Financial and Societal Outcomes of Different Types of Corporate Responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-008-9712-5
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
