Cited by 111Corporate Social Responsibility ReportingCorporate Social Responsibility and SustainabilityJob Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior

CSR initiative characteristics and employee engagement: An impact-based perspective

Opoku‐Dakwa, Akwasi, Chen, Chao C., Rupp, Deborah E.·2018·Journal of Organizational Behavior

Abstract

Summary: Though corporations depend on the work of employees to achieve important humanitarian and environmental outcomes, research on employee engagement in corporate social responsibility initiatives (CSRIs) remains limited and fragmented. Building on existing studies, we develop a theoretical model explaining when and why CSRIs, on the basis of their distinctive characteristics, would be engaging to employees. Adopting the lens of social cognitive theory, we position employees as potential agents of social change, whose efforts are enabled through CSRIs that are expected to meaningfully impact stakeholders (including the employees themselves, their employing organizations, and external beneficiaries). We first model CSRIs in terms of their focus characteristics, which reflect the different types of goals that CSRIs can have. We then explain how these CSRI characteristics promote employee engagement through anticipated impacts that are commensurate with employees' personal expectations. Lastly, we explain how these effects depend on organizational support for the CSRI, which shapes employees' beliefs about the collective efficacy of the organization to achieve the CSRI goals, and on employees' identities, which determine the types of CSRI impacts that are more meaningful and therefore more conducive to engagement. We conclude with a discussion of implications for research and practice.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/job.2281

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • People in organizations play a vital role in the effectiveness and success of a company's sustainability strategy.

    “and despite insights that people in organizations play a vital role in the effectiveness and success of a company's sustainability strategy (e.g., Cohen, Taylor, & Muller-Camen, 2012;Opoku-Dakwa, Chen, & Rupp, 2018).”

    From Common Good HRM: A paradigm shift in Sustainable HRM? (2020) · cites this paper as Opoku-Dakwa, Chen, & Rupp, 2018

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Opoku‐Dakwa, A., Chen, C. C., & Rupp, D. E.
Affiliations
  • Duquesne University (US)
  • Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey (US)
  • Purdue University West Lafayette (US)
Corresponding author
Opoku‐Dakwa, Akwasi
Venue
Journal of Organizational Behavior
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2018-04-10
Volume
39
Issue
5
Pages
580-593
ISSN
  • 0894-3796 (ISSN-L)
  • 1099-1379
OpenAlex
W2797138270
Cited by
111
References
11
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 2
FWCI
17.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Organizational Behavior (publishedVersion)
  • Rutgers University Community Repository (Rutgers University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Corporate Social Responsibility and Sustainability
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
Keywords
corporate social responsibility initiatives, employee engagement, social cognitive theory, organizational support, employee identity, collective efficacy, stakeholder impact

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review