The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Determinants of Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosure Ratings by Spanish Listed Firms
Open accessAbstract
The aim of this paper is to analyze whether a number of firm and industry characteristics, as well as media exposure, are potential determinants of corporate social responsibility (CSR) disclosure practices by Spanish listed firms. Empirical studies have shown that CSR disclosure activism varies across companies, industries, and time (Gray et al., Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal8(2), 47–77, 1995; Journal of Business Finance & Accounting28(3/4), 327–356, 2001; Hackston and Milne, Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal9(1), 77–108, 1996; Cormier and Magnan, Journal of International Financial Management and Accounting1(2), 171–195, 2003; Cormier et al., European Accounting Review14(1), 3–39, 2005), which is usually justified by reference to several theoretical constructs, such as the legitimacy, stakeholder, and agency theories. Our findings evidence that firms with higher CSR ratings present a statistically significant larger size and a higher media exposure, and belong to more environmentally sensitive industries, as compared to firms with lower CSR ratings. However, neither profitability nor leverage seem to explain differences in CSR disclosure practices between Spanish listed firms. The most influential variable for explaining firms’ variation in CSR ratings is media exposure, followed by size and industry. Therefore, it seems that the legitimacy theory, as captured by those variables related to public or social visibility, is the most relevant theory for explaining CSR disclosure practices of Spanish listed firms.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Strategic Responses to Institutional Processes
Oliver, C. (1991) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.1991.4279002 · Cited by 8,950
WHY COMPANIES GO GREEN: A MODEL OF ECOLOGICAL RESPONSIVENESS.
Bansal, P., & Roth, K. (2000) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.2307/1556363 · Cited by 4,020
The Adolescence of Institutional Theory
Scott, W. R. (1987) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2392880 · Cited by 3,699
Environmental disclosures, regulatory costs, and changes in firm value
Blacconiere, W. G., & Patten, D. M. (1994) · Journal of Accounting and Economics · doi:10.1016/0165-4101(94)90026-4 · Cited by 782
Cited by
ESG performance and firm value: The moderating role of disclosure
Fatemi, A., Glaum, M., & Kaiser, S. (2018) · Global Finance Journal · doi:10.1016/j.gfj.2017.03.001 · Cited by 1,611
The role of board gender and foreign ownership in the CSR performance of Chinese listed firms
McGuinness, P. B., Vieito, J. P., & Wang, M. (2017) · Journal of Corporate Finance · doi:10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2016.11.001 · Cited by 939
The impact of board composition on the level of ESG disclosures in GCC countries
Arayssi, M., Jizi, M., & Tabaja, H. H. (2020) · Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal · doi:10.1108/sampj-05-2018-0136 · Cited by 482
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting and Organizational Stigma: The Case of “Sin” Industries
Grougiou, V., Dedoulis, E., & Leventis, S. (2016) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.06.041 · Cited by 275
The Impact of Voluntary Sustainability Reporting on Firm Value: Insights from Signaling Theory
Friske, W., Hoelscher, S. A., & Nikolov, A. N. (2023) · Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science · doi:10.1007/s11747-022-00879-2 · Cited by 249
Metadata
- Authors
- Reverte, C.
- Venue
- Journal of Business Ethics
- Published
- 2008-10-14
- Volume
- 88
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 351-366
- ISSN
- 0167-4544 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-0697
- OpenAlex
- W2044757591
- Cited by
- 1,333
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 24.44
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Determinants of Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosure Ratings by Spanish Listed Firms. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/s10551-008-9968-9
- The paper
- Reverte, C. (2009). Determinants of Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosure Ratings by Spanish Listed Firms. Journal of Business Ethics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-008-9968-9
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.