The DOI matches its Crossref record; 113 of the 113 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Review of the Empirical Ethical Decision-Making Literature: 2004–2011
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Advances In Experimental Social Psychology
(2022) · Advances in Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2601(22)x0002-6 · Cited by 22,259
From Intentions to Actions: A Theory of Planned Behavior
Ajzen, I. (1985) · Action Control · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-69746-3_2 · Cited by 19,057
Culture's Consequences: International Differences in Work-Related Values.
Sorge, A., & Hofstede, G. (1983) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2393017 · Cited by 15,062
Schwartz, S. H. (1992) · Advances in Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2601(08)60281-6 · Cited by 14,619
Research in Organizational Behavior.
Grimes, A. J., Cummings, L. L., & Staw, B. M. (1986) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2392975 · Cited by 10,899
In A Different Voice: Psychological Theory And Women's Development
Gilligan, & Carol, C. (1982) · Cited by 10,869
(1973) · DigitalGeorgetown (Georgetown University Library) · Cited by 10,144
Culture's Consequences: International Differences in Work-Related Values
Gladwin, T. N., & Hofstede, G. (1981) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/257651 · Cited by 9,275
In a Different Voice: Psychological Theory and Women’s Development
GILLIGAN, C. (1993) · doi:10.4159/9780674037618 · Cited by 9,127
Ethical Decision Making by Individuals in Organizations: An Issue-Contingent Model
Jones, T. M. (1991) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/258867 · Cited by 4,135
Cited by
Ethical Decision-Making Theory: An Integrated Approach
Schwartz, M. S. (2016) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-015-2886-8 · Cited by 465
Lehnert, K., Park, Y.-H., & Singh, N. (2015) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-014-2147-2 · Cited by 247
Zhu, W., Huang, L., Zhou, X., Li, X., Shi, G., Ying, J., & Wang, C. (2025) · International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction · doi:10.1080/10447318.2024.2323277 · Cited by 143
The Role of Religiosity in Ethical Decision-Making: A Study on Islam and the Malaysian Workplace
Sulaiman, R., Toulson, P., Brougham, D., Lempp, F., & Haar, J. (2022) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-021-04836-x · Cited by 62
Balancing privacy rights and surveillance analytics: a decision process guide
Power, D. J., Heavin, C., & O’Connor, Y. (2021) · Journal of Business Analytics · doi:10.1080/2573234x.2021.1920856 · Cited by 48
Metadata
- Authors
- Craft, J. L.
- Venue
- Journal of Business Ethics
- Published
- 2012-10-09
- Volume
- 117
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 221-259
- ISSN
- 0167-4544 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-0697
- OpenAlex
- W2085968192
- Cited by
- 586
- References
- 113
- FWCI
- 29.85
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Review of the Empirical Ethical Decision-Making Literature: 2004–2011. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/s10551-012-1518-9
- The paper
- Craft, J. L. (2013). A Review of the Empirical Ethical Decision-Making Literature: 2004–2011. Journal of Business Ethics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-012-1518-9
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
