The DOI matches its Crossref record; 50 of the 58 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Common Good of the Firm and Humanistic Management: Conscious Capitalism and Economy of Communion
Open accessOverview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Thus, Common Good HRM places collective interests above -or more realistically equal to -individual (including organizational) wishes, needs, and desires (Daly & Cobb, 1994;Frémeaux & Michelson, 2017).”
From Common Good HRM: A paradigm shift in Sustainable HRM? (2020) · cites this paper as Frémeaux & Michelson, 2017
Citations
Cites
(2010) · Cited by 24,023
The complete works of Aristotle
, A. (1954) · Cited by 4,133
May, D. R., Gilson, R. L., & Harter, L. M. (2004) · Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology · doi:10.1348/096317904322915892 · Cited by 3,483
Buber, M., & Kaufmann, W. (1923) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 3,197
Natural Law and Natural Rights.
Tuck, R., & FINNIS, J. M. (1981) · The Philosophical Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2219123 · Cited by 1,696
Natural Law and Natural Rights.
Wilcox, W. H., & FINNIS, J. M. (1983) · The Philosophical Review · doi:10.2307/2184884 · Cited by 1,498
Paradox and Performance: Toward a Theory of Behavioral Complexity in Managerial Leadership
Denison, D. R., Hooijberg, R., & Quinn, R. E. (1995) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.6.5.524 · Cited by 956
A Competing Values Approach to Organizational Effectiveness
Quinn, R. E., & Rohrbaugh, J. (1981) · Public Productivity Review · doi:10.2307/3380029 · Cited by 840
Laloux, F. (2015) · Vahlen eBooks · doi:10.15358/9783800649143 · Cited by 707
The Stakeholder Theory and the Common Good
Argandoña, A. (1998) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1023/a:1006075517423 · Cited by 464
Research works printed but not linked: 11
- Bruni, L. (Ed.). (2002). The economy of communion. New York: New City Press.
- Buber, M. (1937). I and thou. New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons.
- Cortright, S. A., & Naughton, M. (Eds.). (2002). Rethinking the purpose of business: Interdisciplinary essays from the Catholic social tradition. Notre Dame, IN: Notre Dame University Press.
- Fessard, G. (1944). Autorité et bien commun. Paris: Aubier.
- Gallagher, J., & Buckeye, J. (2014). The business practices of the economy of communion. New York: New City Press.
- Lubich, C. (2001). L’economia di comunione, storia e profezia. Rome: Città Nuova.
- Lubich, C. (2007). Essential writings: Spirituality, dialogue, culture (compiled and edited by M. Vandeleene). London: New City Press.
- MacIntyre, A. (1981). After virtue. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.
- Mounier, E. (1970). Personalism (P. Mairet, Trans.). Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.
- Pelligra, V., & Ferrucci, A. (2004). Economia di comunione, una cultura nuova. Rome: Quaderni di Economia di Comunione.
- Peters, T. (1992). Liberation management: Necessary disorganization for thenanosecond nineties. New York: Random House.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Common Good HRM: A paradigm shift in Sustainable HRM?
Aust, I., Matthews, B., & Muller-Camen, M. (2020) · Human Resource Management Review · doi:10.1016/j.hrmr.2019.100705 · Cited by 531
Lu, Y., Zhang, M. M., Yang, M. M.-H., & Wang, Y. (2022) · Human Resource Management · doi:10.1002/hrm.22153 · Cited by 559
Sustainable Marketing and Consumer Support for Sustainable Businsses
Peterson, M., Minton, E. A., Liu, R. L., & Bartholomew, D. E. (2020) · Sustainable Production and Consumption · doi:10.1016/j.spc.2020.10.018 · Cited by 128
The Consumer Experience of Responsibilization: The Case of Panera Cares
Eckhardt, G. M., & Dobscha, S. (2019) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-018-3795-4 · Cited by 93
Money and the Commons: An Investigation of Complementary Currencies and Their Ethical Implications
Meyer, C., & Hudon, M. (2019) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-018-3923-1 · Cited by 83
Metadata
- Authors
- Frémeaux, S., & Michelson, G.
- Affiliations
- Audencia Business School (FR)
- Macquarie University (AU)
- Corresponding author
- Michelson, Grant
- Venue
- Journal of Business Ethics
- Published
- 2016-03-16
- Volume
- 145
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 701-709
- ISSN
- 0167-4544 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-0697
- OpenAlex
- W2323254409
- Cited by
- 129
- References
- 58
- Citations by year
- 2026: 20 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 1
- FWCI
- 9.09
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- audencia.hal.science
- Licence
- other-oa
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Journal of Business Ethics (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- HAL (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Corporate Social Responsibility and Sustainability
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Ethics in Business and Education
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
- Keywords
- humanistic management, conscious capitalism, economy of communion, Christian ethics, community good, personal good, corporate purpose, business ethics
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review