Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 371

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 110 of the 110 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

How Perceived Corporate Social Responsibility Affects Employee Cynicism: The Mediating Role of Organizational Trust

Serrano Archimi, Carolina, Reynaud, Emmanuelle, Yasin, Hina Mahboob, Bhatti, Zeeshan Ahmed·2018·Journal of Business Ethics
DOI 10.1007/s10551-018-3882-6
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10551-018-3882-6

Cites

110 of 110 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 110 references

Research works printed but not linked: 11

  1. Aupperle, K., Hatfield, J., & Carroll, A. (1983). Instrument development and application in CSR. Academy of Management Proceedings, 369–373. · doi:10.5465/ambpp.1983.4976378
  2. Barbalet, J. M. (1996). Social emotions: Confidence, trust and loyalty. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 16(9/10), 75–96. · doi:10.1108/eb013270
  3. Brandes, P., Dharwadkar, R., & Dean, J. W. (1999). Does organizational cynicism matter? Employee and supervisor perspectives on work outcomes. In Proceedings of the 36th annual meeting of the Eastern Academy of Management, Philadelphia.
  4. Bustamante, S. (2014). CSR, trust and the employer brand, CSR trends. In J. Reichel (Ed.), Beyond business as usual. Łódź: CSR Impact.
  5. Cummings, L. L., & Bromiley, P. (1996). The occupational trust inventory (OTI): Development and validation. In R. Kramer & T. Tyler (Eds.), Trust in organizations (pp. 302–330). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  6. Cutler, I. (2000). The cynical manager. Management Learning, 31(3), 295–312. · doi:10.1177/1350507600313002
  7. James, K. (1993). The social context of organizational justice: Cultural, intergroup, and structural effects on justice behaviors and perceptions. In R. Cropanzano (Ed.), Justice in the workplace: Approaching fairness inhuman resources management (pp. 21–50). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  8. Limerick, D., & Cunnington, B. (1993). Managing the new organisation: A blueprint for networks and strategic alliances. Chatswood: Business and Professional Publishing.
  9. Miles, R. E., & Ritchie, J. B. (1971). Participative management: Quality vs. quantity. California Management Review, 13, 48–56. · doi:10.2307/41164319
  10. Mustain, M. (2014). Overcoming cynicism: William James and the metaphysics of engagement. New York: Continuum Publishing Corporation.
  11. Persais, E. (2007). La RSE est-elle une question de convention? Revue Française de Gestion, 172(3), 79–97. · doi:10.3166/rfg.172.79-97

Cited by

See all 371

Metadata

Authors
Serrano Archimi, C., Reynaud, E., Yasin, H. M., & Bhatti, Z. A.
Venue
Journal of Business Ethics
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2018-05-02
Volume
151
Issue
4
Pages
907-921
ISSN
  • 0167-4544 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-0697
DOI
10.1007/s10551-018-3882-6
OpenAlex
W2802789794
Cited by
371
References
110
FWCI
36.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: How Perceived Corporate Social Responsibility Affects Employee Cynicism: The Mediating Role of Organizational Trust. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/s10551-018-3882-6
The paper
Serrano Archimi, C., Reynaud, E., Yasin, H. M., & Bhatti, Z. A. (2018). How Perceived Corporate Social Responsibility Affects Employee Cynicism: The Mediating Role of Organizational Trust. Journal of Business Ethics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-018-3882-6

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.