Contesting dishonesty: When and why perspective-taking decreases ethical tolerance of marketplace deception
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The effects of deepfakes on businesses have received scant attention, despite researchers noting firms are not immune to their effects.
“The effects of deepfakes on businesses have received scant attention, despite the fact that researchers have noted firms are not immune to their effects (Chadderton & Croft, 2006; Xie et al., 2020).”
From Deepfakes: Deceptions, mitigations, and opportunities (2023) · cites this paper as Xie et al., 2020
Marketplace deception has been primarily investigated from the consumer perspective, with heavy emphasis on how it affects consumers.
“To date, marketplace deception has been primarily investigated from the consumer perspective, with a heavy emphasis on how it affects consumers (Taylor, 2021; Xie et al., 2020).”
From Deepfakes: Deceptions, mitigations, and opportunities (2023) · cites this paper as Xie et al., 2020
Cites
Campbell, M. C., & Kirmani, A. (2000) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1086/314309 · Cited by 1,342 · see citing works
The defensive consumer: Advertising deception, defensive processing, and distrust
Darke, P. R., & Ritchie, R. J. B. (2007) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1509/jmkr.44.1.114 · Cited by 609 · see citing works
Berger, J., & Heath, C. (2008) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.95.3.593 · Cited by 549 · see citing works
Lehnert, K., Park, Y.-H., & Singh, N. (2015) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-014-2147-2 · Cited by 247 · see citing works
Taking Another Person's Perspective Increases Self-Referential Neural Processing
Ames, D. L., Jenkins, A. C., Banaji, M. R., & Mitchell, J. P. (2008) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02135.x · Cited by 162 · see citing works
Mazzocco, P. J., Rucker, D. D., Galinsky, A. D., & Anderson, E. T. (2012) · Journal of Consumer Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jcps.2012.07.002 · Cited by 147 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Deepfakes: Deceptions, mitigations, and opportunities
Mustak, M., Salminen, J., Mäntymäki, M., Rahman, A., & Dwivedi, Y. K. (2023) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.113368 · Cited by 209 · see citing works
- Authors
- Xie, G.-X., Chang, H., & Rank-Christman, T.
- Affiliations
- University of Massachusetts Boston (US)
- Towson University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Xie, Guang-Xin
- ORCID
- Xie, Guang-Xin
- Venue
- Journal of Business Ethics
- Published
- 2020-07-23
- Volume
- 175
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 117-133
- ISSN
- 0167-4544 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-0697
- OpenAlex
- W3044855870
- Cited by
- 21
- References
- 6
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 2
- FWCI
- 3.23
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Business Ethics (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- University of Massachusetts Boston
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Ethics in Business and Education
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification
- Keywords
- perspective taking, consumer deception, moral self-awareness, moral judgment
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
