Cited by 162Social and Intergroup PsychologyAction Observation and SynchronizationChild and Animal Learning Development

Taking Another Person's Perspective Increases Self-Referential Neural Processing

Open access
Ames, Daniel L., Jenkins, Adrianna C., Banaji, Mahzarin R., Mitchell, Jason P.·2008·Psychological Science

Abstract

The ability to adopt the perspective of another person has been identified as a critical component of social functioning that pre-dicts level of empathic concern for other individuals (Davis, 1983) and level of category-based responding toward out-groups (Gal-insky&Moskowitz, 2000).One explanation for these effects holds that in taking another person’s perspective, one comes to treat that person as more ‘‘selflike’’; indeed, the extent to which perceivers describe another person as sharing their own personality attri-butes increases after they imagine an event from that person’s perspective (Davis, Conklin, Smith, & Luce, 1996). An alterna-tive explanation, however, is that perspective taking might lead only to a shift in non-self-based social-cognitive processes de-ployed when considering the minds of others (Mitchell, Heath-erton, &Macrae, 2002). How exactly does taking another person’s perspective lead to greater overlap between self and other?

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02135.x

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The involvement of the anterior PFC may reflect self-oriented processing, as the anterior PFC is implicated in perspective-taking, prospection, and self-reflection.

    “Its involvement may reflect self-oriented processing, as the anterior PFC is implicated in perspective-taking (Ames et al., 2008), prospection (Addis et al., 2007) and self-reflection (Modinos et al., 2009).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ames, D. L., Jenkins, A. C., Banaji, M. R., & Mitchell, J. P.
Affiliations
Harvard University (US)
Corresponding author
Mitchell, Jason P.
Venue
Psychological Science
Published
2008-07
Volume
19
Issue
7
Pages
642-644
ISSN
  • 0956-7976 (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-9280
OpenAlex
W2105535286
Cited by
162
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 9
FWCI
38.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Psychological Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Digital Access to Scholarship at Harvard (DASH) (Harvard University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
National Center for Research Resources (P41-RR-14075, P41RR014075)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Action Observation and Synchronization
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Child and Animal Learning Development
Keywords
perspective taking, self-referential processing, self-other overlap, social cognition, empathy, theory of mind, self-concept
MeSH terms
Attitude, Brain, Female, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Judgment, Male, Personality, Self Concept, Social Perception

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review