Cited by 11Family Support in IllnessChild Welfare and AdoptionSocial Policies and Family

Unequal Conditions of Care and the Implications for Social Policies on Young Carers

Open access
Alexander, Chloe·2021·Child and Adolescent Social Work Journal

Abstract

Abstract Young carers are the subject of public policies in the UK, which aim to address their needs as a group experiencing disadvantage relating to their caring role. These policies are implemented in a way that aims to improve their health and their educational and social opportunities, but left unaddressed is a wider context of inequalities. Nevertheless, inequalities are a feature of the terrain upon which social policies for young carers are developed and implemented. Evaluation of the ways that young carers and their families are impacted by public policies demands an understanding of those inequalities. Academic knowledge of how experiences diverge as a result of multiple intersecting inequalities is so far limited. This paper reports from a study that aimed to contribute greater understanding of the interaction between inequalities, young carers, family life and social policies in England. Ethnographic research methods created a record of care, family life and the impact of social policies. Unequal conditions of care are an important feature of the lives of young people and their families with on-going caring responsibilities. Young carers and their families positioned at the intersection of inequalities of ‘race’/ethnicity, class and disability had different and unequal experiences of support. The paper discusses these findings and explores the implications for social policies and social work practice.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10560-021-00781-w

Cites

68 of 68 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Policies and resources provided to parentified children vary by countries.

    “Policies and resources provided to parentified children also vary by countries [168].”

    From Parentification Vulnerability, Reactivity, Resilience, and Thriving: A Mixed Methods Systematic Literature Review (2023) · cites this paper as [168]

    The “Young Carers in England” section describes English legislation and support services for young carers, calling England’s framework a leading global policy response. The Conclusion discusses applying this work in other contexts, but the paper does not establish how policies or resources vary between countries. (LLM, conf=0.75)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

3 of the 71 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Alexander, C.
Affiliations
University of Birmingham (GB)
Corresponding author
Alexander, Chloe
Venue
Child and Adolescent Social Work Journal
Published
2021-08-17
Volume
38
Issue
5
Pages
505-518
ISSN
  • 0738-0151 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-2797
OpenAlex
W3195198212
Cited by
11
References
71
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1
FWCI
2.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Child and Adolescent Social Work Journal (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • University of Birmingham Research Portal (University of Birmingham) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • UK Research and Innovation
  • School of Social Policy, University of Birmingham
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Family Support in Illness
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Child Welfare and Adoption
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social Policies and Family
Keywords
young carers, social policy, inequality, intersectionality, race and ethnicity, social class, disability, family life, caregiving responsibilities, social work practice, support services, England

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review