Cited by 7,232Feminist Theory and Gender StudiesDiscrimination and Equality LawFeminism, Gender, and Sexuality Studies

Demarginalizing the Intersection of Race and Sex: A Black Feminist Critique of Antidiscrimination Doctrine, Feminist Theory, and Antiracist Politics

Open access
Crenshaw, Kimberle·2018·Living with Contradictions

Abstract

This chapter examines how the tendency is perpetuated by a single-axis framework that is dominant in antidiscrimination law and that is also reflected in feminist theory and antiracist politics. It suggests that this single-axis framework erases Black women in the conceptualization, identification and remediation of race and sex discrimination by limiting inquiry to the experiences of otherwise-privileged members of the group. The chapter focuses on otherwise-privileged group members creates a distorted analysis of racism and sexism because the operative conceptions of race and sex become grounded in experiences that actually represent only a subset of a much more complex phenomenon. It argues that Black women are sometimes excluded from feminist theory and antiracist policy discourse because both are predicated on a discrete set of experiences that often does not accurately reflect the interaction of race and gender. The chapter discusses the feminist critique of rape and separate spheres ideology.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4324/9780429499142-5

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Still being checked.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Crenshaw, K.
Corresponding author
Crenshaw, Kimberle
Venue
Living with Contradictions
Publisher
Routledge
Published
2018-03-08
Pages
39-52
OpenAlex
W4249292692
Cited by
7,232
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 21 · 2025: 895 · 2024: 1262 · 2023: 1258 · 2022: 991 · 2021: 838 · 2020: 594 · 2019: 410 · 2018: 277 · 2017: 204 · 2016: 137 · 2015: 81 · 2014: 74 · 2013: 47 · 2012: 38
FWCI
1496.84
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Routledge eBooks (publishedVersion)
  • PhilPapers (PhilPapers Foundation) (submittedVersion)
  • bepress Legal Repository (submittedVersion)
  • eYLS (Yale Law School) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Feminist Theory and Gender Studies
  • Social Sciences › Law › Discrimination and Equality Law
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Feminism, Gender, and Sexuality Studies
Keywords
intersectionality, Black women, anti-discrimination law, feminist theory, rape, separate spheres ideology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review