Cited by 189Motivation and Self-Concept in SportsParental Involvement in EducationEducation, Achievement, and Giftedness

Parental Autonomy Support and Student Learning Goals: A Preliminary Examination of an Intrinsic Motivation Intervention

Froiland, John Mark·2011·Child & Youth Care Forum

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10566-010-9126-2

Cites

42 of 42 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 44 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Froiland, J. M.
Affiliations
University of Northern Colorado (US)
Corresponding author
Froiland, John Mark
Venue
Child & Youth Care Forum
Published
2010-11-03
Volume
40
Issue
2
Pages
135-149
ISSN
  • 1053-1890 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-3319
OpenAlex
W2027294201
Cited by
189
References
44
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 52 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 4
FWCI
6.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Child & Youth Care Forum (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Motivation and Self-Concept in Sports
  • Social Sciences › Education › Parental Involvement in Education
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
Keywords
parental autonomy support, intrinsic motivation, learning objectives, homework, parent intervention, elementary school students, self-determination theory

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review