CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 658Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional DevelopmentAttachment and Relationship DynamicsEarly Childhood Education and Development

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 261 of the 261 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Nature and Nurturing: Parenting in the Context of Child Temperament

Open access
Kiff, Cara J., Lengua, Liliana J., Zalewski, Maureen·2011·Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review
DOI 10.1007/s10567-011-0093-4PMC PMC3163750
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Accounting for both bidirectional and interactive effects between parenting and child temperament can fine-tune theoretical models of the role of parenting and temperament in children's development of adjustment problems. Evidence for bidirectional and interactive effects between parenting and children's characteristics of frustration, fear, self-regulation, and impulsivity was reviewed, and an overall model of children's individual differences in response to parenting is proposed. In general, children high in frustration, impulsivity and low in effortful control are more vulnerable to the adverse effects of negative parenting, while in turn, many negative parenting behaviors predict increases in these characteristics. Frustration, fearfulness, and effortful control also appear to elicit parenting behaviors that can predict increases in these characteristics. Irritability renders children more susceptible to negative parenting behaviors. Fearfulness operates in a very complex manner, sometimes increasing children's responses to parenting behaviors and sometimes mitigating them and apparently operating differently across gender. Important directions for future research include the use of study designs and analytic approaches that account for the direction of effects and for developmental changes in parenting and temperament over time.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10567-011-0093-4

Cites

261 of 261 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 258 references

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Calkins, S. D., & Johnson, M. C. (1998b). Toddler regulation of distress to frustrating events: Temperamental and maternal correlates. Infant Behavior and Development, 21, 379–395. · DOI
  2. Halverson, C. F., & Deal, J. E. (2001). Temperamental change, parenting, and the family context. In T. D. Wachs & G. A. Kohnstamm (Eds.), Temperament in Context (pp. 61–79). New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  3. Malatesta, C. Z., & Haviland, J. M. (1982). Measuring change in infant emotional expressivity: Two approaches applied in longitudinal investigation. In: C. E. Izard (Ed.), Measuring emotions in infants and children: Based on seminars sponsored by the committee on social and affective development during childhood of the social science research council, Vol. 2.
  4. Patterson, G. R., Reid, J. R., & Dishion, T. J. (1992). Antisocial boys. Eugene, OR: Castalia.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 601–657 of 657

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Kiff, C. J., Lengua, L. J., & Zalewski, M.
Affiliations
University of Washington (US)
Corresponding author
Lengua, Liliana J.
ORCID
Venue
Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2011-04-02
Volume
14
Issue
3
Pages
251-301
ISSN
  • 1096-4037 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-2827
DOI
10.1007/s10567-011-0093-4
PMC
PMC3163750
OpenAlex
W1971476163
Cited by
658
References
258
Citations by year
2026: 26 · 2025: 38 · 2024: 53 · 2023: 48 · 2022: 53 · 2021: 45 · 2020: 108 · 2019: 46 · 2018: 43 · 2017: 43 · 2016: 46 · 2015: 43 · 2014: 32 · 2013: 21 · 2012: 12
FWCI
3.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
Locations
  • Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (R01HD054465)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Early Childhood Education and Development
Keywords
parenting, child temperament, bidirectional effects, interaction effects, frustration, fearfulness, effortful control, impulsivity, self-regulation, negative parenting, irritability, child adjustment problems, individual differences, gender differences
MeSH terms
Child, Child Behavior, Child Rearing, Child, Preschool, Female, Humans, Infant, Infant, Newborn, Male, Parent-Child Relations, Temperament, Parenting

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review