Cited by 4,123Personality Traits and PsychologyPersonality Disorders and PsychopathologyNeural and Behavioral Psychology Studies

The Five Factor Model and impulsivity: using a structural model of personality to understand impulsivity

Whiteside, Stephen P., Lynam, Donald R.·2001·Personality and Individual Differences

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0191-8869(00)00064-7

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Whiteside, S. P., & Lynam, D. R.
Affiliations
University of Kentucky (US)
Corresponding author
Lynam, Donald R.
Venue
Personality and Individual Differences
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2001-03
Volume
30
Issue
4
Pages
669-689
ISSN
0191-8869 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2016124154
Cited by
4,123
References
39
Citations by year
2026: 181 · 2025: 208 · 2024: 242 · 2023: 240 · 2022: 245 · 2021: 263 · 2020: 336 · 2019: 240 · 2018: 246 · 2017: 253 · 2016: 241 · 2015: 232 · 2014: 217 · 2013: 224 · 2012: 191
FWCI
21.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Personality and Individual Differences (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Keywords
Big Five personality traits, impulsivity, urgency, premeditation, perseverance, sensation seeking, personality facets, impulsive behavior, young adults, NEO-PI-R

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review