Cited by 95Genomics and Chromatin DynamicsChromatin Remodeling and CancerEpigenetics and DNA Methylation

ChIP bias as a function of cross-linking time

Open access
Baranello, Laura, Kouzine, Fedor, Sanford, Suzanne, Levens, David·2016·Chromosome Research

Abstract

The chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) assay is widely used to capture interactions between chromatin and regulatory proteins in vivo. Formaldehyde cross-linking of DNA and proteins is a critical step required to trap their interactions inside the cells before immunoprecipitation and analysis. Yet insufficient attention has been given to variables that might give rise to artifacts in this procedure, such as the duration of cross-linking. We analyzed the dependence of the ChIP signal on the duration of formaldehyde cross-linking time for two proteins: DNA topoisomerase 1 (Top1) that is functionally associated with the double helix in vivo, especially with active chromatin, and green fluorescent protein (GFP) that has no known bona fide interactions with DNA. With short time of formaldehyde fixation, only Top1 immunoprecipation efficiently recovered DNA from active promoters, whereas prolonged fixation augmented non-specific recovery of GFP dramatizing the need to optimize ChIP protocols to minimize the time of cross-linking, especially for abundant nuclear proteins. Thus, ChIP is a powerful approach to study the localization of protein on the genome when care is taken to manage potential artifacts.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10577-015-9509-1

Cites

18 of 18 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The ChIP technique in general can produce false findings.

    “Notably, the ChIP technique in general can produce false findings.”

    From Census and evaluation of p53 target genes (2017) · cites this paper as [141]

  • ChIP signals vary relative to formaldehyde crosslinking time.

    “and ChIP signals vary in general relative to formaldehyde crosslinking time.140, 141”

    From Census and evaluation of p53 target genes (2017) · cites this paper as [141]

  • ChIP is not equally adept at measuring all interactions.

    “While ChIP is not equally adept at measuring all interactions (Baranello et al., 2016; Teytelman et al., 2013), recent methods have overcome some of these limitations (Janssens et al., 2018; Skene and Henikoff, 2017; Skene et al., 2018; Zhu et al., 2019).”

    From Unraveling Hematopoiesis through the Lens of Genomics (2020) · cites this paper as Baranello et al., 2016

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Baranello, L., Kouzine, F., Sanford, S., & Levens, D.
Affiliations
National Institutes of Health (US)
Corresponding author
Baranello, Laura
Venue
Chromosome Research
Published
2015-12-21
Volume
24
Issue
2
Pages
175-181
ISSN
  • 0967-3849 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-6849
OpenAlex
W2276366744
Cited by
95
References
18
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 2
FWCI
2.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Chromosome Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institutes of Health (Z99 CA999999)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Chromatin Remodeling and Cancer
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Epigenetics and DNA Methylation
Keywords
chromatin immunoprecipitation, formaldehyde crosslinking, crosslinking time, green fluorescent protein, protein-DNA interactions, protocol optimization
MeSH terms
Chromatin, Cross-Linking Reagents, DNA, DNA Topoisomerases, Type I, DNA-Binding Proteins, Formaldehyde, Humans, Time Factors, HCT116 Cells, Cell Line, Tumor, Chromatin Immunoprecipitation, Green Fluorescent Proteins

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review