Cited by 803Genomics and Chromatin DynamicsChromatin Remodeling and CancerEpigenetics and DNA Methylation

Targeted in situ genome-wide profiling with high efficiency for low cell numbers

Open access
Skene, Peter J, Henikoff, Jorja G, Henikoff, Steven·2018·Nature Protocols

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Cleavage under targets and release using nuclease (CUT&RUN) is an epigenomic profiling strategy in which antibody-targeted controlled cleavage by micrococcal nuclease releases specific protein-DNA complexes into the supernatant for paired-end DNA sequencing. As only the targeted fragments enter into solution, and the vast majority of DNA is left behind, CUT&RUN has exceptionally low background levels. CUT&RUN outperforms the most widely used chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) protocols in resolution, signal-to-noise ratio and depth of sequencing required. In contrast to ChIP, CUT&RUN is free of solubility and DNA accessibility artifacts and has been used to profile insoluble chromatin and to detect long-range 3D contacts without cross-linking. Here, we present an improved CUT&RUN protocol that does not require isolation of nuclei and provides high-quality data when starting with only 100 cells for a histone modification and 1,000 cells for a transcription factor. From cells to purified DNA, CUT&RUN requires less than a day at the laboratory bench and requires no specialized skills.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nprot.2018.015

Cites

50 of 50 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Recent methods have overcome some limitations of ChIP.

    “While ChIP is not equally adept at measuring all interactions (Baranello et al., 2016; Teytelman et al., 2013), recent methods have overcome some of these limitations (Janssens et al., 2018; Skene and Henikoff, 2017; Skene et al., 2018; Zhu et al., 2019).”

    From Unraveling Hematopoiesis through the Lens of Genomics (2020) · cites this paper as Skene et al., 2018

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Skene, P. J., Henikoff, J. G., & Henikoff, S.
Affiliations
  • Howard Hughes Medical Institute (US)
  • Fred Hutch Cancer Center (US)
Corresponding author
Henikoff, Steven
Venue
Nature Protocols
Published
2018-04-12
Volume
13
Issue
5
Pages
1006-1019
ISSN
  • 1750-2799 (ISSN-L)
  • 1754-2189
OpenAlex
W2757704052
Cited by
803
References
50
Citations by year
2026: 69 · 2025: 112 · 2024: 130 · 2023: 97 · 2022: 127 · 2021: 119 · 2020: 78 · 2019: 54 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1
FWCI
23.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Protocols (publishedVersion)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Chromatin Remodeling and Cancer
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Epigenetics and DNA Methylation
Keywords
CUT&RUN, staphylococcal nuclease, protein-DNA complex, histone modifications, transcription factors, epigenetic profiling, signal-to-noise ratio, protocol optimization
MeSH terms
Animals, Cell Line, Chromatin, DNA, DNA-Binding Proteins, Humans, Epigenomics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review