Cited by 72Language Development and DisordersChild and Animal Learning DevelopmentInfant Development and Preterm Care

Early Markers of Language and Attention: Mutual Contributions and the Impact of Parent–Infant Interactions

Gartstein, Maria A., Crawford, Jennifer, Robertson, Christopher D.·2008·Child Psychiatry and Human Development

Abstract

This study of was conducted to explore the contribution of attentional skills to early language, and the influence of early language markers on the development of attention, simultaneously examining the impact of parent-child interaction factors (reciprocity/synchrony and sensitivity/responsivity), including their potential moderator effects. All children were between 6 months and 12 months of age, and about equally distributed between genders (33 males, 32 females), with caregivers' ages ranging from 28 years to 45 years (N = 65). Maternal perceptions of infant attentional skills (duration of orienting, or persistence of attention, and perceptual sensitivity-the infant's ability to selectively attend to subtle stimuli) and an early marker of language (vocal reactivity: use of vocalizations across a variety of activities), along with observations of parent-child interactions, provided the basis for the present evaluation. Infant duration of orienting emerged as the primary predictor of vocal reactivity, with the contribution of perceptual sensitivity approaching significance. Infant vocal reactivity explained significant amounts of variance for duration of orienting and perceptual sensitivity. Parent-infant interaction factors contributed to the prediction of early attentional skills, with responsivity/sensitivity explaining a significant portion of perceptual sensitivity variance, and synchronicity/reciprocity emerging as a significant predictor of duration of orienting. Observed contribution of the vocal reactivity * responsivity/sensitivity interaction to predicting infant perceptual sensitivity provided preliminary support for the proposed moderation.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10578-007-0067-4

Cites

73 of 73 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gartstein, M. A., Crawford, J., & Robertson, C. D.
Affiliations
  • Washington State University (US)
  • Palo Alto University (US)
Corresponding author
Gartstein, Maria A.
Venue
Child Psychiatry and Human Development
Published
2007-06-15
Volume
39
Issue
1
Pages
9-26
ISSN
  • 0009-398X (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-3327
OpenAlex
W2087425801
Cited by
72
References
73
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 4
FWCI
3.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Child Psychiatry & Human Development (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Language Development and Disorders
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Child and Animal Learning Development
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Infant Development and Preterm Care
Keywords
infant attention, early childhood language development, parent-infant interaction, perceptual sensitivity, maternal perceptions, infants
MeSH terms
Adult, Age Factors, Attention, Child, Child Language, Communication, Female, Humans, Infant, Interpersonal Relations, Male, Parent-Child Relations, Surveys and Questionnaires, Verbal Behavior

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review