Cited by 34Attention Deficit Hyperactivity DisorderDevelopmental and Educational NeuropsychologyNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior

Acetyl-L-Carnitine as an Adjunctive Therapy in the Treatment of Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder in Children and Adolescents: A Placebo-Controlled Trial

Abbasi, Seyed-Hesameddin, Heidari, Shahram, Mohammadi, Mohammad-Reza, Tabrizi, Mina, Ghaleiha, Ali, Akhondzadeh, Shahin·2011·Child Psychiatry & Human Development

Abstract

The objective of this study was to test whether a previous observed Acetyl-L-carnitine (ALC) treatment effect could be repeated in an ALC adjunctive therapy treatment trial of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in children and adolescents. This was a six-week, randomized clinical trial undertaken in an outpatient child and adolescent clinic. Subjects included 40 outpatients (28 boys and 12 girls) between the ages of 7-13 who met the DSM-IV-TR diagnostic criteria for ADHD. All study subjects were randomly assigned to receive treatment using capsules of ALC doses ranging from 500 to 1,500 mg/day depending on the weight of the child plus methylphenidate at a dose of 20-30 mg/day depending on weight or Placebo plus methylphenidate at a dose of 20-30 mg/day depending on weight. The principal measure of outcome was the Teacher and Parent attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder Rating Scale- IV. No difference was observed between the two groups on the Parent and Teacher Rating Scale scores (df = 1; F = 0.10; P = 0.74 and df = 1; F = 0.22; P = 0.63 respectively). Side effects consisting of headache and irritability were observed more frequently in the methylphenidate plus placebo group. The results of this study do not support the application of ALC as an adjunctive therapy to methylphenidate in children and adolescents with ADHD.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10578-011-0220-y

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Abbasi, S.-H., Heidari, S., Mohammadi, M.-R., Tabrizi, M., Ghaleiha, A., & Akhondzadeh, S.
Affiliations
  • National Iranian Oil Company (Iran) (IR)
  • Roozbeh Hospital (IR)
  • Tehran University of Medical Sciences (IR)
  • Hamedan University of Medical Sciences (IR)
Corresponding author
Akhondzadeh, Shahin
Venue
Child Psychiatry & Human Development
Published
2011-02-19
Volume
42
Issue
3
Pages
367-375
ISSN
  • 0009-398X (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-3327
OpenAlex
W1991040694
Cited by
34
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 4 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 2
FWCI
2.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Child Psychiatry & Human Development (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Developmental and Educational Neuropsychology
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
Keywords
acetyl-L-carnitine, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, adjunctive therapy, methylphenidate, children and adolescents, ADHD Rating Scale-IV, treatment efficacy, adverse effects
MeSH terms
Acetylcarnitine, Adolescent, Analysis of Variance, Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity, Child, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Drug Administration Schedule, Female, Humans, Male, Treatment Outcome, Nootropic Agents

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review