Cited by 134Autism Spectrum Disorder ResearchSchizophrenia research and treatmentAttention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder

A Head-to-Head Comparison of Aripiprazole and Risperidone for Safety and Treating Autistic Disorders, a Randomized Double Blind Clinical Trial

Open access
Ghanizadeh, Ahmad, Sahraeizadeh, Aliakbar, Berk, Michael·2014·Child Psychiatry & Human Development

Abstract

Aripiprazole and risperidone are the only FDA approved medications for treating irritability in autistic disorder, however there are no head-to-head data comparing these agents. This is the first prospective randomized clinical trial comparing the safety and efficacy of these two medications in patients with autism spectrum disorders. Fifty nine children and adolescents with autism spectrum disorders were randomized to receive either aripiprazole or risperidone for 2 months. The primary outcome measure was change in Aberrant Behavior Checklist (ABC) scores. Adverse events were assessed. Aripiprazole as well as risperidone lowered ABC scores during 2 months. The rates of adverse effects were not significantly different between the two groups. The safety and efficacy of aripiprazole (mean dose 5.5 mg/day) and risperidone (mean dose 1.12 mg/day) were comparable. The choice between these two medications should be on the basis of clinical equipoise considering the patient's preference and clinical profile.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10578-013-0390-x

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ghanizadeh, A., Sahraeizadeh, A., & Berk, M.
Affiliations
  • Shiraz University (IR)
  • Deakin University (AU)
Corresponding author
Ghanizadeh, Ahmad
Venue
Child Psychiatry & Human Development
Published
2013-06-26
Volume
45
Issue
2
Pages
185-192
ISSN
  • 0009-398X (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-3327
OpenAlex
W1969516074
Cited by
134
References
26
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 4
FWCI
5.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Child Psychiatry & Human Development (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Minerva Access (University of Melbourne) (submittedVersion)
  • Deakin Research Online (Deakin University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Bristol-Myers Squibb
  • Eli Lilly and Company
  • Pfizer
  • Sanofi
  • Geelong Region Medical Research Foundation
  • Beyond Blue
  • Shiraz University of Medical Sciences
  • Shiraz University
  • Servier
  • H. Lundbeck A/S
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Health and Medical Research Council
  • Cilag
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
Keywords
aripiprazole, risperidone, autism spectrum disorder, irritability, antipsychotic drugs, Aberrant Behavior Checklist, adverse events, drug safety, children and adolescents, clinical equipoise
MeSH terms
Aripiprazole, Adolescent, Autistic Disorder, Body Weight, Child, Child, Preschool, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Double-Blind Method, Female, Humans, Irritable Mood, Male, Piperazines, Antipsychotic Agents, Quinolones, Treatment Outcome, Risperidone

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review