Cited by 49Child Development and Digital TechnologyImpact of Technology on AdolescentsChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development

Differential relationships of child anxiety and depression to child report and parent report of electronic media use

Open access
Fors, Payton Q., Barch, Deanna M.·2019·Child Psychiatry & Human Development

Abstract

Child depression and anxiety have been associated with electronic media use, but the comorbidity between the two has rarely been accounted for in analyses. We examined both child and parent reports of electronic media use in relation to parent-reported child depression and anxiety. Using survey and interview data collected for 9- to 11-year-olds from the 21-site adolescent brain cognitive development study, we conducted generalized linear mixed models. Our results demonstrated that electronic media use was more strongly associated with depression than anxiety, and that accounting for depression significantly reduced the relationship between electronic media use and anxiety. Different categories of electronic media showed differential relationships to anxiety and depression, with video gaming and video chatting related to anxiety, but video watching related to depression. These findings provide important data to ground theories of the mechanisms that contribute to these associations.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10578-019-00892-7

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fors, P. Q., & Barch, D. M.
Affiliations
Washington University in St. Louis (US)
Corresponding author
Fors, Payton Q.
Venue
Child Psychiatry & Human Development
Published
2019-05-06
Volume
50
Issue
6
Pages
907-917
ISSN
  • 0009-398X (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-3327
OpenAlex
W2944248072
Cited by
49
References
39
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 8
FWCI
8.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Child Psychiatry & Human Development (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institutes of Health (U01DA041120-01)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Child Development and Digital Technology
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
Keywords
childhood anxiety, childhood depression, electronic media use, video gaming, video chat, video viewing, comorbidities, parent report, child report, Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development Study, children aged 9-11
MeSH terms
Screen Time, Anxiety, Child, Depression, Female, Humans, Male, Parents, Telecommunications, Video Games, Internet, Self Report

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review