Cited by 226Indigenous Studies and EcologyIndigenous Peoples' Rights and LawEnvironmental law and policy

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 43 of the 43 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Justice forward: tribes, climate adaptation and responsibility.

Whyte, Kyle Powys·2013·Climatic Change

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10584-013-0743-2

Cites

43 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In some cases, reservation land is marginally productive, and non-tribal agricultural operators often lease substantial portions of tribal agricultural lands.

    “In some cases, this reservation land is marginally productive, and non-tribal agricultural operators often lease substantial portions of tribal agricultural lands (Table 1; Anderson and Lueck, 1992;Whyte, 2013;USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service, 2019).”
  • Whyte (2013) argues that Native American collective continuance (i.e., the capacity to adapt to probable futures) will require an interdisciplinary approach that applies science, policy, and traditional knowledge to develop community-tailored adaptive management strategies.

    “Whyte (2013) argues that Native American collective continuance (i.e., the capacity to adapt to probable futures) will require an interdisciplinary approach that applies science, policy, and traditional knowledge to develop community-tailored adaptive management strategies.”

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. Grossman Z (2008) Indigenous Nations’ Responses Climate Change Am Indian Cult Res J 32:5–27
  2. Harris G (ed.): (2011) Northwest Forest Plan - The First 15 Years [1994–2008]: Effectiveness of the Federal-Tribal Relationship, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Region, Portland
  3. McGregor D (2008) Linking traditional ecological knowledge and Western science: aboriginal perspectives from the 2000 State of the Lakes Ecosystem Conference. Can J Nativ Stud XXVIII:139–158
  4. Mears J (2012) A Climate Change Focused Organization. First Stewards Symposium: Coastal Peoples Address Climate Change. First Stewards Symposium, Washington, DC
  5. Shearer C (2012) The social construction of Alaska native vulnerability to climate change. Race Gend Class 19:61–79
  6. Voggesser G (2013) The tribal path forward: confronting climate change and conserving nature. Wildl Prof 4:24–30
  7. Young OR, Agrawal A, King LA, Sand PH, Underdal A, Wasson M (1999) Institutional dimensions of global environmental change. Science Plan. IHDP, Bonn

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Whyte, K. P.
Affiliations
Michigan State University (US)
Corresponding author
Whyte, Kyle Powys
Venue
Climatic Change
Published
2013-04-03
Volume
120
Issue
3
Pages
517-530
ISSN
  • 0165-0009 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-1480
OpenAlex
W2070841852
Cited by
226
References
43
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 32 · 2018: 20 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 13
FWCI
23.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Climatic Change (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Funders
Australian Government
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › Indigenous Studies and Ecology
  • Social Sciences › Law › Indigenous Peoples' Rights and Law
  • Social Sciences › Law › Environmental law and policy
Keywords
climate change adaptation, federally recognized tribes, indigenous peoples, justice, responsibility, glacier retreat, sea level rise, relocation, tribal communities

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review