The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Environmental justice, american indians and the cultural dilemma: developing environmental management for tribal health and well-being.
Abstract
Environmental justice in the tribal context cannot be contemplated apart from a recognition of American Indian tribes' unique historical, political, and legal circumstances. American Indian tribes are sovereign governments, with inherent powers of self-government over their citizens and their territories. Their status as sovereign entities predates contact with European settlers. This separate status, nonetheless, was affirmed by the United States early on and is enshrined in the U.S. Constitution. Tribes today continue to exist as distinct sovereigns within the boundaries of the United States.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Tribal management is often hindered by non-tribal regulatory frameworks that are not inclusive of tribal systems and sovereignty.
“Often, tribal management is hindered by non-tribal regulatory frameworks that are not inclusive of tribal systems and sovereignty (Ranco et al., 2011).”
From The Potential of Bison Restoration as an Ecological Approach to Future Tribal Food Sovereignty on the Northern Great Plains (2022) · cites this paper as Ranco et al., 2011
Citations
Cites
A Native American Exposure Scenario
Harris, S. G., & HARPER, B. L. (1997) · Risk Analysis · doi:10.1111/j.1539-6924.1997.tb01284.x · Cited by 141
Self-citation"Risk Avoidance, Cultural Discrimination, and Environmental Justice for Indigenous Peoples"
O'Neill, C. A. (2003) · bepress Legal Repository · doi:10.15779/z38555q · Cited by 37
Self-citationRanco, D., & Suagee, D. B. (2007) · Antipode · doi:10.1111/j.1467-8330.2007.00547.x · Cited by 33
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 4
- O'Neill Catherine A., 2007, Litigation, 22, 131
- Goodman Ed, 2000, Environmental Law, 30, 308
- Rodgers William H., 2007, Environment, 21, 3
- Deloria Sam, 2006, Natural Resources J., 46, 301
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Justice forward: tribes, climate adaptation and responsibility.
Whyte, K. P. (2013) · Climatic Change · doi:10.1007/s10584-013-0743-2 · Cited by 226
Shamon, H., Cosby, O. G., Andersen, C. L., Augare, H., BearCub Stiffarm, J., Bresnan, C. E., Brock, B. L., Carlson, E., Deichmann, J. L., Epps, A., et al. (2022) · Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution · doi:10.3389/fevo.2022.826282 · Cited by 56
Metadata
- Authors
- Ranco, D. J., O'Neill, C. A., Donatuto, J., & Harper, B. L.
- Affiliations
- Seattle University (US)
- Venue
- Environmental Justice
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2011-12
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 221-230
- ISSN
- 1937-5174 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-4071
- OpenAlex
- W2010001943
- Cited by
- 54
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 30.05
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Environmental Justice (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Law › Indigenous Peoples' Rights and Law
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Environmental Justice and Health Disparities
- Social Sciences › Law › Environmental law and policy
- Keywords
- Native American tribes, tribal sovereignty, tribal self-governance, tribal health, environmental management
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
