Cited by 65Species Distribution and Climate ChangeInsect behavior and control techniquesEntomological Studies and Ecology

Global bioclimatic suitability for the fall armyworm, Spodoptera frugiperda (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae), and potential co-occurrence with major host crops under climate change scenarios

Zacarias, Daniel Augusta·2020·Climatic Change

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10584-020-02722-5

Cites

55 of 55 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zacarias, D. A.
Affiliations
Eduardo Mondlane University (MZ)
Corresponding author
Zacarias, Daniel Augusta
Venue
Climatic Change
Published
2020-05-11
Volume
161
Issue
4
Pages
555-566
ISSN
  • 0165-0009 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-1480
OpenAlex
W3021774278
Cited by
65
References
55
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 2
FWCI
15.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Climatic Change (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecological Modeling › Species Distribution and Climate Change
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Insect Science › Insect behavior and control techniques
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Entomological Studies and Ecology
Keywords
Spodoptera frugiperda, invasive species, bioclimatic suitability, species distribution modeling, climate change scenarios, host plants, maize, crop damage, range expansion, sub-Saharan Africa, North America

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review