Cited by 107Species Distribution and Climate ChangeEntomological Studies and EcologyInsect behavior and control techniques

Predicting climate change impacts on potential worldwide distribution of fall armyworm based on CMIP6 projections

Ramasamy, Maruthadurai, Das, Bappa, Ramesh, R.·2022·Journal of Pest Science

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10340-021-01411-1

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 46 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ramasamy, M., Das, B., & Ramesh, R.
Affiliations
Indian Council of Agricultural Research (IN)
Venue
Journal of Pest Science
Published
2021-07-28
Volume
95
Issue
2
Pages
841-854
ISSN
  • 0003-6307 (ISSN-L)
  • 1612-4758
  • 1612-4766
OpenAlex
W3184137469
Cited by
107
References
46
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 26 · 2024: 31 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 1
FWCI
69.84
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Pest Science (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecological Modeling › Species Distribution and Climate Change
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Entomological Studies and Ecology
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Insect Science › Insect behavior and control techniques
Keywords
Spodoptera frugiperda, climate change impacts, species distribution modeling, CMIP6 projections, Shared Socioeconomic Pathways, bioclimatic variables, invasive pest spread, food security

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review