CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 53

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Population structure, dispersal and colonization history of the garden bumblebee Bombus hortorum in the Western Isles of Scotland

Goulson, D., Kaden, J. C., Lepais, O., Lye, G. C., Darvill, B.·2011·Conservation Genetics
DOI 10.1007/s10592-011-0190-4
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

New methods of analysing genetic data provide powerful tools for quantifying dispersal patterns and reconstructing population histories. Here we examine the population structure of the bumblebee Bombus hortorum in a model island system, the Western Isles of Scotland, using microsatellite markers. Following declines in other species, B. hortorum is the only remaining long-tongued bumblebee species found in much of Europe, and thus it is of particular ecological importance. Our data suggest that populations of B. hortorum in western Scotland exist as distinct genetic clusters occupying groups of nearby islands. Population structuring was higher than for other bumblebee species which have previously been studied in this same island group (Fst = 0.16). Populations showed significant isolation by distance. This relationship was greatly improved by using circuit theory to allow dispersal rates to differ over different landscape features; as we would predict, sea appears to provide far higher resistance to dispersal than land. Incorporating bathymetry data improved the fit of the model further; populations separated by shallow seas are more genetically similar than those separated by deeper seas. We argue that this probably reflects events following the last ice age when the islands were first colonized by this bee species (8,500–5,000 ybp), when the sea levels were lower and islands separated by shallow channels would have been joined. In the absence of significant gene flow these…

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10592-011-0190-4

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In the context of ecosystem services, circuit theory has been used to examine the landscape genetic structure and movements of pollinators, especially bees, in response to habitat and land-use changes.

    “In the context of ecosystem services, circuit theory has been used to examine the landscape genetic structure and movements of pollinators, especially bees, in response to habitat and land-use changes (e.g., Goulson et al. 2011; Lander et al. 2013; Lozier et al. 2013; Jaffe et al. 2016a, 2016b).”

    From Circuit‐theory applications to connectivity science and conservation (2019) · cites this paper as Goulson et al. 2011

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 51

  1. Alberto F (2009) MsatAllele_1.0: an R packge to visualize the binning of microsatellite alleles. J Hered 100:394–397 · DOI
  2. Becker JJ, Dandwell DT, Smith WHF, Braud J, Binder B, Depner J, Fabre D, Factor R, Von Rosenberg J, Wallace G, Weatherall P (2009) Global bathymetry and elevation data at 30 arc seconds resolution: SRTM30_PLUS. Mar Geodesy 32:355–371 · DOI
  3. Beerli P (2006) Comparison of Bayesian and maximum likelihood inference of population genetic parameters. Bioinformatics 22:341–345 · DOI
  4. Carvell C, Westrich P, Meek WR, Pywell RF, Nowakowski M (2006) Assessing the value of annual and perennial forage mixtures for bumblebees by direct observation and pollen analysis. Apidologie 37:326–340 · DOI
  5. Charman TG, Sears J, Green RE, Bourke AFG (2010) Conservation genetics, foraging distance and nest density of the scarce Great Yellow Bumblebee (Bombus distinguendus). Mol Ecol 19:2661–2674 · DOI
  6. Cushman SA, McKelvey KS, Hayden J, Schwartz MH (2006) Gene flow in complex landscapes: testing multiple hypotheses with causal modeling. Am Nat 168:486–499 · DOI · Paper page
  7. Darvill B, Ellis J, Lye GC, Goulson D (2006) Population structure and inbreeding in a rare and declining bumblebee, Bombus muscorum (Hymenoptera: Apidae). Mol Ecol 15:601–611 · DOI
  8. Darvill B, Lye GC, Goulson D (2007) Aggregations of male Bombus muscorum (Hymenoptera: Apidae) at mature nests. Incestuous brothers or amorous suitors? Apidologie 38:518–524 · DOI
  9. Darvill B, O’Connor S, Lye GC, Lepais O, Goulson D (2010) Cryptic differences in dispersal lead to differential sensitivity to habitat fragmentation in two bumblebee species. Mol Ecol 19:53–63 · DOI
  10. Dixon P (2003) VEGAN, a package of R functions for community ecology. J Veg Sci 14:927–930 · DOI
  11. El Mousadik A, Petit RJ (1996) High level of genetic differentiation for allelic richness among populations of the argan tree [Argania spinosa (L) Skeels] endemic to Morocco. Theor Appl Genet 92:832–839 · DOI
  12. Ellis JS, Knight ME, Darvill B, Goulson D (2006) Extremely low effective population sizes, genetic structuring and reduced genetic diversity in a threatened bumblebee species, Bombus sylvarum (Hymenoptera: Apidae). Mol Ecol 15:4375–4386 · DOI
  13. Esselstyn JA, Brown RM (2009) The role of repeated sea-level fluctuations in the generation of shrew (Soricidae: Crocidura) diversity in the Philippine Archipelago. Mol Phyl Evol 53:171–181 · DOI
  14. Estoup A, Scholl A, Pouvreau A, Solignac M (1995) Monoandry and polyandry in bumble bees (Hymenoptera–Bombinae) as evidenced by highly variable microsatellites. Mol Ecol 4:89–93 · DOI
  15. Estoup A, Solignac M, Cornuet JM, Goudet J, Scholl A (1996) Genetic differentiation of continental and island populations of Bombus terrestris (Hymenoptera: Apidae) in Europe. Mol Ecol 5:19–31 · DOI
  16. Falush D, Stephens M, Pritchard JK (2003) Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data: linked loci and correlated allele frequencies. Genetics 164:1567–1587 · DOI
  17. Faubet P, Waples RS, Gaggiotti OE (2007) Evaluating the performance of a multilocus Bayesian method for the estimation of migrtion rates. Mol Ecol 16:1149–1166 · DOI
  18. Goudet J (1995) FSTAT (Version 1.2): a computer program to calculate F-statistics. J Hered 86:485–486 · DOI
  19. Goulson D, Hanley ME, Darvill B, Ellis JS, Knight ME (2005) Causes of rarity in bumblebees. Biol Cons 122:1–8 · DOI
  20. Goulson D, Hanley ME, Darvill B, Ellis JS (2006) Biotope associations and the decline of bumblebees (Bombus spp.). J Ins Cons 10:95–103 · DOI
  21. Goulson D, Lye GC, Darvill B (2008b) Diet breadth, coexistence and rarity in bumblebees. Biodiv Conserv 17:3269–3288 · DOI
  22. Holehouse KA, Hammond RL, Bourke AFG (2003) Non-lethal sampling of DNA from bumble bees for conservation genetics. Insect Soc 50:277–285 · DOI
  23. Jones OR, Wang J (2009) COLONY: a program for parentage and sibship inference from multilocus genotype data. Mol Ecol Resour 10:551–555 · DOI
  24. Jordan JT, Smith DE, Dawson S, Dawson AG (2010) Holocene relative sea-level changes in Haris, Outer Hebrides, Scotland, UK. J Quat Sci 25:115–134 · DOI
  25. Kraus FB, Wolf S, Moritz RFA (2009) Male flight distance and population substructure in the bumblebee Bombus terrestris. J Anim Ecol 78:247–252 · DOI
  26. Legendre P, Legendre L (1998) Numerical ecology, 2nd English edn. Elsevier, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
  27. Lepais O, Darvill B, O’Connor S, Osborne J, Sanderson RA, Cussans J, Goffe L, Goulson D (2010) Estimation of bumblebee queen dispersal distances using sibship reconstruction method. Mol Ecol 19:819–831 · DOI
  28. Lozier JD, Cameron SA (2009) Comparative genetic analyses of historical and contemporary collections highlight contrasting demographic histories for the bumble bees Bombus pennsylvanicus and B. impatiens in Illinois. Mol Ecol 18:1875–1886 · DOI
  29. McRae BH, Beier P (2007) Circuit theory predicts gene flow in plant and animal populations. PNAS 104:19885–19890 · DOI · Paper page
  30. Nei M (1987) Molecular evolutionary genetics. Columbia University Press, New York · DOI
  31. Paradis E, Claude J, Strimmer K (2004) ‘APE: analyses of phylogenetics and evolution in R language. Bioinformatics 20:289–290 · DOI · Paper page
  32. Pritchard JK, Stephens M, Donnelly P (2000) Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data. Genetics 155:945–959 · DOI
  33. Pritchard JK, Wen X, Falush D (2009) Documentation for structure software: version 2.3. Department of Human Genetics, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL
  34. R Developement Core Team (2009) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria
  35. Rasmont P, Mersch P (1988) Première estimation de la dérive faunique chez les bourdons de la Belgique (Hymenoptera, Apidae). Annales de la Société Royale Zoologique de Belgique 118:141–147
  36. Redpath N, Osgathorpe LM, Park KJ, Goulson D (2010) Crofting and bumblebee conservation: the impact of land management practices on bumblebee populations in northwest Scotland. Biol Cons 143:492–500 · DOI
  37. Rice WR (1989) Analyzing tables of statistical tests. Evolution 43:223–225 · DOI · Paper page
  38. Ritchie W, Whittington G, Edwards KJ (2001) Holocene changes in the physiography and vegetation of the Atlantic littoral of the Uists, Outer Hebrides, Scotland. Trans R Soc Edinb Earth Sci 92:121–136 · DOI
  39. Rousset F (1997) Genetic differentiation and estimation of gene flow from F-statistics under isolation by distance. Genetics 145:1219–1228 · DOI
  40. Rousset F (2010) GENEPOP’007: a complete re-implementation of the GENEPOP software for Windows and Linux. Mol Ecol Resour 8:103–106 · DOI
  41. Schmid-Hempel R, Schmid-Hempel P (2000) Female mating frequencies in Bombus spp. from Central Europe. Insect Soc 47:36–41 · DOI
  42. Sladen FWL (1912) The Humble-bee, its life history and how to domesticate it. Including The Humble Bee (1892). Logaston Press,
  43. Takahashi J, Ayabe T, Mitsuhata M, Shimizu I, Ono M (2008) Diploid male production in a rare and locally distributed bumblebee, Bombus florilegus (Hymenoptera, Apidae). Insect Soc 55:43–50 · DOI
  44. Truett GE, Heeger P, Mynatt RL, Truett AA, Walker JA, Warman ML (2000) Preparation of PCR-quality mouse genomic DNA with hot sodium hydroxide and tris (HotSHOT). BioTechniques 29:52–54 · DOI
  45. Van Oosterhout C, Hutchinson WF, Wills DPM, Shipley P (2004) MICRO-CHECKER: software for identifying and correcting genotyping errors in microsatellite data. Mol Ecol Notes 4:535–538 · DOI · Paper page
  46. Wang J (2004) Sibship reconstruction from genetic data with typing errors. Genetics 166:1963–1979 · DOI · Paper page
  47. Waters J, Darvill B, Lye GC, Goulson D (in press) Niche differentiation of a cryptic bumblebee complex in the Western Isles of Scotland. Ins Cons Div
  48. Weir BS, Cockerham CC (1984) Estimating F-statistics for the analysis of population structure. Evolution 38:1358–1370 · DOI
  49. Williams PH, Osborne JL (2009) Bumblebee vulnerability and conservation world-wide. Apidologie 40:367–387 · DOI
  50. Wilson GA, Rannala B (2003) Bayesian inference of recent migration rates using multilocus genotypes. Genetics 163:1177–1191 · DOI
  51. Zayed A, Packer L (2005) Complementary sex determination substantially increases extinction proneness of haplodiploid populations. PNAS 102:10742–10746 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Goulson, D., Kaden, J. C., Lepais, O., Lye, G. C., & Darvill, B.
Venue
Conservation Genetics
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2011-01-30
Volume
12
Issue
4
Pages
867-879
ISSN
  • 1566-0621
  • 1572-9737
DOI
10.1007/s10592-011-0190-4
Cited by
53
References
2
Language
en
Licence
www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review