Cited by 103Agriculture and Farm SafetyMental Health Treatment and AccessSuicide and Self-Harm Studies

Psychological Morbidity of Farmers and Non-farming Population: Results from a UK Survey

Hounsome, Barry, Edwards, Rhiannon T., Hounsome, Natalia, Edwards-Jones, Gareth·2012·Community Mental Health Journal

Abstract

The relatively high rate of suicide among UK farmers suggests that they may suffer greater mental health problems than the general population. This paper provides a comparison of the psychological morbidity of farmers and their partners/spouses with non-farmers. The General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-12) was administered using face-to-face interviews with 784 attendees of agricultural shows in the UK. Results show that GHQ-12 scores for farmers and their partners/spouses were significantly higher (P < 0.001) than those for the non-farming population, indicating higher psychological morbidity among farmer families. Approximately 35% of farmers had scores 12 and higher (recommended cut-off for psychiatric disorders), compared to 27% of non-farmers. Within the farmers group, male respondents, those aged from 45 to 64, self-employed or not in paid employment, having a non-supervisory position and living in a rural area were characterized by higher mean GHQ-12 scores compared to correspondent subgroups from the non-farming population.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10597-011-9415-8

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 42 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Boulanger, S., Deaville, J., Randall-Smith, J., & Wynn-Jones, J. (1999a). Farm suicide in rural Wales—a review of the services in Powys and Ceredigion. Powys: Institute of Rural Health.
  2. Boulanger, S., Gilman, A., & Deaville, J. (1999b). Farmers’ stress survey. Powys: Institute of Rural Health.
  3. McGregor, M., Willock, J., & Deary, I. (1995). Farmer stress. Journal of Farm Management, 9, 59–65.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Hounsome, B., Edwards, R. T., Hounsome, N., & Edwards-Jones, G.
Affiliations
Bangor University (GB)
Corresponding author
Hounsome, Barry
Venue
Community Mental Health Journal
Published
2011-05-10
Volume
48
Issue
4
Pages
503-510
ISSN
  • 0010-3853 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-2789
OpenAlex
W2025653116
Cited by
103
References
42
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 2
FWCI
2.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Community Mental Health Journal (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Agriculture and Farm Safety
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
Keywords
farmer mental health, psychological morbidity, farm households, General Health Questionnaire, mental illness, rural population, agricultural exhibitions, mental health risk factors
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Agricultural Workers' Diseases, Agriculture, Mental Disorders, Employment, Female, Health Surveys, Humans, Interviews as Topic, Male, Mental Health, Middle Aged, Morbidity, Surveys and Questionnaires, Residence Characteristics, Rural Health, Rural Population, Socioeconomic Factors, Stress, Psychological, Wales, Age Distribution, Sex Distribution, Spouses, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review