Past depression and gender interact to influence emotional reactivity to daily life stress
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Women present more often with emotional problems than men.
“women present more often with emotional problems than men, e.g. see [21]”
From How to boost positive interpretations? A Meta-Analysis of the effectiveness of cognitive bias modification for interpretation (2014) · cites this paper as [21]
Women are more emotionally reactive than men.
“it has long been recognized that women are more emotionally reactive than men, e.g., see [21].”
From How to boost positive interpretations? A Meta-Analysis of the effectiveness of cognitive bias modification for interpretation (2014) · cites this paper as [21]
Women and remitted patients showed worse mood and higher emotional reactivity in response to daily stressors.
“they showed worse mood and higher emotional reactivity in response to daily stressors”
From Current state and future directions of technology-based ecological momentary assessment and intervention for major depressive disorder: a systematic review (2019) · cites this paper as [54]
Women and remitted patients evaluated daily events as more negative than men.
“women and remitted patients evaluated daily events as more negative than men”
From Current state and future directions of technology-based ecological momentary assessment and intervention for major depressive disorder: a systematic review (2019) · cites this paper as [54]
At least some MDD patients in remission continue to experience relatively high current levels of negative affect and stress even when they no longer meet diagnostic criteria for a current major depressive episode.
“from these studies it appears that at least some patients continue to experience relatively high current levels of NA and stress even when they no longer meet diagnostic criteria for a current major depressive episode.”
From Mood Disorders in Everyday Life: A Systematic Review of Experience Sampling and Ecological Momentary Assessment Studies (2012) · cites this paper as Husky et al., 2009
ESM/EMA studies in remitted MDD patients have identified chronic high levels of negative affect and stress as residual symptoms that may over time contribute to relapse.
“In summary, ESM/EMA studies in remitted MDD patients have identi fi ed various residual symptoms that may over time contribute to relapse: lingering complaints about physical symptoms and a poor quality of life (Barge-Schaapveld & Nicolson, 2002) chronic high levels of NA and stress (Husky et al., 2009; Knowles et al., 2007), and perhaps a low motivation to engage in physical activity (Wichers”
From Mood Disorders in Everyday Life: A Systematic Review of Experience Sampling and Ecological Momentary Assessment Studies (2012) · cites this paper as Husky et al., 2009
Male patients in remission from MDD experienced more depressed mood following stressful events than male controls, whereas there was no such difference between female remitted patients and female controls.
“they found that male patients in remission from MDD experienced more depressed mood following stressful events than male controls, whereas there was no such difference between female remitted patients and female controls.”
From Mood Disorders in Everyday Life: A Systematic Review of Experience Sampling and Ecological Momentary Assessment Studies (2012) · cites this paper as Husky et al. (2009)
MDD patients in remission may appear similar to controls at a global level of functioning, but ESM/EMA can still reveal subtle abnormalities that could potentially contribute to future relapse.
“The data from BargeSchaapveld and Nicolson (2002) and Husky et al. (2009) suggest that while MDD patients in remission may appear similar to controls at a global level of functioning, ESM/EMA can still reveal subtle abnormalities that could potentially contribute to future relapse.”
From Mood Disorders in Everyday Life: A Systematic Review of Experience Sampling and Ecological Momentary Assessment Studies (2012) · cites this paper as Husky et al. (2009)
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 60 · Cited by 62
- Authors
- Husky, M. M., Mazure, C. M., Maciejewski, P. K., & Swendsen, J. D.
- Affiliations
- New York State Psychiatric Institute (US)
- Yale University (US)
- Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
- Corresponding author
- Husky, Mathilde M.
- Venue
- Cognitive Therapy and Research
- Published
- 2008-09-12
- Volume
- 33
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 264-271
- ISSN
- 0147-5916 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-2819
- OpenAlex
- W2080678163
- Cited by
- 62
- References
- 60
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 1.81
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Cognitive Therapy and Research (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Mental Health Research Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
- Keywords
- remitted depression, emotional reactivity, daily stress, gender differences, stress vulnerability, depressive mood
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review