Cited by 107Mindfulness and Compassion InterventionsCognitive Functions and MemoryCognitive Abilities and Testing

Performance-Based Tests of Attention and Memory in Long-Term Mindfulness Meditators and Demographically Matched Nonmeditators

Lykins, Emily L. B., Baer, Ruth A., Gottlob, Lawrence R.·2012·Cognitive Therapy and Research

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10608-010-9318-y

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lykins, E. L. B., Baer, R. A., & Gottlob, L. R.
Affiliations
University of Kentucky (US)
Corresponding author
Baer, Ruth A.
Venue
Cognitive Therapy and Research
Published
2010-05-14
Volume
36
Issue
1
Pages
103-114
ISSN
  • 0147-5916 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-2819
OpenAlex
W2012800898
Cited by
107
References
41
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 25 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 2
FWCI
1.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Cognitive Therapy and Research (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Functions and Memory
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
Keywords
mindfulness meditation, attention, memory, sustained attention, attentional shift, working memory, short-term memory, long-term memory, free recall, cued recall

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review