Cited by 52Personality Disorders and PsychopathologyPsychoanalysis and Psychopathology ResearchPersonality Traits and Psychology

ATTACHMENT THEORY AND RESEARCH APPLIED TO THE CONCEPTUALIZATION AND TREATMENT OF PATHOLOGICAL NARCISSISM

Bennett, C. Susanne·2006·Clinical Social Work Journal

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10615-005-0001-9

Cites

46 of 46 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bennett, C. S.
Affiliations
Catholic University of America (US)
Corresponding author
Bennett, C. Susanne
Venue
Clinical Social Work Journal
Published
2005-12-17
Volume
34
Issue
1
Pages
45-60
ISSN
  • 0091-1674 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-3343
OpenAlex
W2027062902
Cited by
52
References
46
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 2
FWCI
1.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Clinical Social Work Journal (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
Keywords
attachment theory, pathological narcissism, narcissistic personality disorder, secure base, attachment models, adult psychopathology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review