Cited by 84Liver Disease Diagnosis and TreatmentHealth Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of LifeAlcohol Consumption and Health Effects

Screening for nonalcoholic steatohepatitis in individuals with type 2 diabetes: a cost-effectiveness analysis

Open access
Corey, Kathleen E., Klebanoff, Matthew J., Tramontano, Angela C., Chung, Raymond T., Hur, Chin·2016·Digestive Diseases and Sciences

Abstract

Background and aim Individuals with type 2 diabetes are at heightened risk for nonalcoholic fatty liver disease, which gives rise to nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) and cirrhosis. Yet, current guidelines do not recommend screening for NASH among these high-risk patients. Using a simulation model, we assessed the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of screening diabetic patients for NASH.Methods A Markov model was constructed to compare two management strategies for 50-year-olds with diabetes. In the No Screening strategy, patients do not undergo screening, although NASH may be diagnosed incidentally over their lifetime. In the NASH Screening strategy, all patients receive a one-time screening ultrasound. Individuals with fatty infiltration on ultrasound then have a liver biopsy, and those found to have NASH receive medical therapy, which decreases progression to cirrhosis. Endpoints evaluated included quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) gained, costs, and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs).Results Screening for NASH decreased the number of individuals who developed cirrhosis by 12.9 % and resulted in an 11.9 % decrease in liver-related deaths. However, screening resulted in 0.02 fewer QALYs, due to the disutility associated with treatment, and was therefore dominated by the No Screening strategy. When the model excluded this quality-of-life decrement, screening became cost-effective, at an ICER of $42,134 per QALY.Conclusions Screening for NASH may improve liver-related outcomes, but is not cost-effective at present, due to side effects of therapy. As better tolerated treatments for NASH become available, even with modest efficacy, screening for NASH will become cost-effective.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10620-016-4044-2

Cites

48 of 48 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Corey, K. E., Klebanoff, M. J., Tramontano, A. C., Chung, R. T., & Hur, C.
Affiliations
  • Harvard University (US)
  • Massachusetts General Hospital (US)
Corresponding author
Corey, Kathleen E.
Venue
Digestive Diseases and Sciences
Published
2016-01-29
Volume
61
Issue
7
Pages
2108-2117
ISSN
  • 0163-2116 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-2568
OpenAlex
W2259472883
Cited by
84
References
47
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 5
FWCI
8.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Digestive Diseases and Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institutes of Health (K23 DK099422, K24 DK078772)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Liver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Alcohol Consumption and Health Effects
Keywords
nonalcoholic steatohepatitis, type 2 diabetes, cost-effectiveness, non-alcoholic fatty liver disease, liver cirrhosis, liver-related mortality, ultrasound screening, liver biopsy, NASH therapy, quality-adjusted life years, Markov model
MeSH terms
Cost-Benefit Analysis, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Humans, Markov Chains, Models, Biological, Risk Factors, Ultrasonography, Early Diagnosis, Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review