Cited by 140Liver Disease Diagnosis and TreatmentHealth Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of LifeAlcohol Consumption and Health Effects

Screening for Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease in Persons with Type 2 Diabetes in the United States Is Cost-effective: A Comprehensive Cost-Utility Analysis

Open access
Noureddin, Mazen, Jones, Calum, Alkhouri, Naim, Gomez, Eduardo Vilar, Dieterich, Douglas T., Rinella, Mary E., Therapondos, George, Girgrah, Nigel +4 more·2020·Gastroenterology

Abstract

The US Preventative Services Task Force has no guidelines on the screening for nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), and the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases (AASLD) guidance does not recommend population screening for NAFLD.1 A reference cited by this guidance concluded that screening is not cost-effective2; however, new data have emerged since then. We hypothesize that screening for NAFLD in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D), starting with ultrasound (US) and alanine aminotransferase or aspartate aminotransferase and followed by noninvasive testing for fibrosis to detect those most likely to have fibrosis stage ≥F2, is more cost-effective than not screening this population.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1053/j.gastro.2020.07.050

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Noureddin, M., Jones, C., Alkhouri, N., Gomez, E. V., Dieterich, D. T., Rinella, M. E., Therapondos, G., Girgrah, N., Mantry, P. S., Sussman, N. L., Figueroa Diaz, V., & Fuchs, M.
Affiliations
  • Cedars-Sinai Medical Center (US)
  • The University of Texas at San Antonio Health Science Center (US)
  • Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (US)
  • Northwestern University (US)
Corresponding author
Noureddin, Mazen
Venue
Gastroenterology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-11
Volume
159
Issue
5
Pages
1985-1987.e4
ISSN
0016-5085 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3047297860
Cited by
140
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 30 · 2021: 26 · 2020: 5
FWCI
15.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Update notices
erratum (2021-05-01)
Open access
Locations
  • Gastroenterology (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Liver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Alcohol Consumption and Health Effects
Keywords
non-alcoholic fatty liver disease, type 2 diabetes, screening, cost-effectiveness, cost-utility analysis, liver ultrasound, alanine aminotransferase, aspartate aminotransferase, liver fibrosis, USPSTF recommendations, AASLD guidelines
MeSH terms
Healthy Lifestyle, Diagnostic Screening Programs, Cost-Benefit Analysis, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Humans, Liver Cirrhosis, Markov Chains, Predictive Value of Tests, Quality of Life, Risk Factors, United States, Reproducibility of Results, Treatment Outcome, Health Care Costs, Models, Economic, Quality-Adjusted Life Years, Risk Reduction Behavior, Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review