Cited by 11Mindfulness and Compassion InterventionsDigital Mental Health InterventionsPancreatitis Pathology and Treatment

Telephone-based mindfulness therapy intervention for patients with chronic pancreatitis

Aivaliotis, Vasiliki Irene, Lee, Yvonne, Zia, Jasmine, Wassef, Wahid, Abramson, Mark, Park, Walter·2017·Digestive Diseases and Sciences

Abstract

Background Patients with chronic pancreatitis (CP) have substantially impaired quality of life (QOL) both physically and mentally. Mindfulness therapy is a form of treatment that has been shown to be beneficial in many medical conditions but has not been evaluated in the CP patient population.Aims The aims of this study were (1) to test the feasibility and usability of a novel telephone-based mindfulness therapy service for patients with CP and (2) to determine whether there was any effect on CP quality of life.Methods We recruited ten patients with suspected or confirmed CP and five controls who were asked to utilize our telephone-based mindfulness therapy service daily for 28 days. Feasibility of the service was defined as the fraction of subjects with a ≥50% compliance rate. Usability was assessed using a System Usability Scale (SUS). QOL was evaluated using the SF-36 questionnaire and the Pancreatitis Quality of Life Instrument (PANQOLI). Paired t tests were used to compare the SF-36 and PANQOLI pre- and post-intervention.Results There was an overall compliance rate of 67%. The mean SUS score for all participants was 79.3, above the average published score of 68. Results showed a significant improvement in the SF-36 Mental Component Summary scores after 28 days of mindfulness therapy for patients with CP, t(9) = 2.48, p = 0.035. There was also a significant improvement in the mean total PANQOLI scores in CP patients, t(9) = 2.41, p = 0.04, most notably in the social domain.Conclusion Our telephone-based mindfulness therapy service represents a feasible and easily usable treatment adjunct for patients with CP, which may provide benefit in QOL by improving mental health-related domains.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10620-016-4389-6

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Aivaliotis, V. I., Lee, Y., Zia, J., Wassef, W., Abramson, M., & Park, W.
Affiliations
  • Stanford Health Care (US)
  • Stanford Medicine (US)
  • University of Washington Medical Center (US)
  • University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School (US)
Corresponding author
Aivaliotis, Vasiliki Irene
Venue
Digestive Diseases and Sciences
Published
2016-12-08
Volume
62
Issue
2
Pages
502-509
ISSN
  • 0163-2116 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-2568
OpenAlex
W2559904421
Cited by
11
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Digestive Diseases and Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
American College of Gastroenterology
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Pancreatitis Pathology and Treatment
Keywords
chronic pancreatitis, mindfulness therapy, telephone-delivered intervention, quality of life, feasibility, usability, mental health, medication adherence, social functioning
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Feasibility Studies, Female, Humans, Male, Mental Health, Middle Aged, Patient Compliance, Quality of Life, Surveys and Questionnaires, Telephone, Case-Control Studies, Pancreatitis, Chronic, Mindfulness

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review