Cited by 25Physical Activity and HealthHepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and PrognosisCancer Risks and Factors

Physical activity and risk of hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Open access
DiJoseph, Kara, Thorp, Audrey, Harrington, Alex, Schmitz, Kathryn H., Chinchilli, Vernon M., Stine, Jonathan G.·2023·Digestive Diseases and Sciences

Abstract

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Physical activity offers promise to protect against multiple non-hepatic primary cancers. We performed a systematic review to quantify the association between physical activity and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) risk. METHODS: We searched the Cochrane Library, Embase, Medline and trial registries through December 2020 for studies that measured physical activity levels in adults at risk for HCC. The primary outcome was HCC. Subgroup analysis was performed limiting to vigorous physical activity. Proportions and random-effects odds ratios (OR) with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated. RESULTS: Seven studies met inclusion criteria, comprising 777,662 subjects (median age 55 years; 55% female). Greater amounts of physical activity were associated with less HCC (OR 0.65, 95% CI 0.45-0.95, p = 0.03) compared to lower amounts. Vigorous physical activity was associated with even less HCC (OR 0.62, 95% CI 0.49-0.79, p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: This meta-analysis demonstrates that greater amounts of physical activity are associated with lower odds of HCC. These results support the use of regular physical activity as an effective way to prevent HCC and provide helpful data to support a for future exercise-based interventional study to better define the optimal exercise prescription for patients at risk for primary liver cancer.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10620-022-07601-w

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Luo X, Yang W, Ma Y et al. Physical activity and risk of hepa- tocellular carcinoma among US men and women. Cancer Prev Res (Phila) 2020;13:707-714.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
DiJoseph, K., Thorp, A., Harrington, A., Schmitz, K. H., Chinchilli, V. M., & Stine, J. G.
Affiliations
Pennsylvania State University (US)
Corresponding author
Stine, Jonathan G.
Venue
Digestive Diseases and Sciences
Published
2022-06-29
Volume
68
Issue
3
Pages
1051-1059
ISSN
  • 0163-2116 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-2568
OpenAlex
W4283709267
Cited by
25
References
44
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 4
FWCI
0.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Digestive Diseases and Sciences (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • ScholarSphere (Penn State Libraries) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hepatology › Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and Prognosis
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer Risks and Factors
Keywords
physical activity, hepatocellular carcinoma, cancer risk, liver cancer prevention, high-intensity exercise, primary liver cancer
MeSH terms
Adult, Female, Carcinoma, Hepatocellular, Humans, Liver Neoplasms, Male, Middle Aged, Exercise

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review