The DOI matches its Crossref record; 30 of the 30 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; 2 of the 19 sources its claims cite were checked for support.
Thinking with Gramsci Today: Gramscian perspectives in ethnographies of Europe
Open accessAbstract
The availability of the new generation of direct-acting antiviral (DAA) therapies for the treatment of chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection has completely transformed the HCV therapeutic landscape. Current regimens provide pan-genotypic coverage that are of short duration, safer, and are highly effective than prior generations of HCV therapeutics. While data from clinical trials and real-world experience continue to demonstrate similar and high sustained virologic response (SVR) rates, the successful implementation of the HCV cascade-of-care including screening, confirmation of active infection, treatment initiation and successful completion of therapy among more challenging populations, such as the underserved populations who are also disproportionally affected by HCV, remains vital to HCV eradication efforts.
Overview
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
This introduction to a *Dialectical Anthropology* special issue argues that Gramsci's concept of common sense (*senso comune*), alongside hegemony and the role of intellectuals, offers contemporary ethnographers of Europe a relational, processual framework for linking everyday taken-for-granted ideas to historical and material power. The editors position the issue's articles as demonstrations of how Gramscian analysis can unpack the resonance of austerity, right-wing populism, and anti-migrant common sense without romanticizing resistance.
Key findings
As an editorial introduction, the piece advances conceptual arguments rather than empirical results:
- Common sense should be understood as "fragmentary, incoherent, and inconsistent heterogeneity" (Crehan 2016, 56) — a "chaotic aggregate of disparate conceptions" (Crehan 2016, 51) — whose concrete configuration the analyst must reconstruct historically.
- Hegemony is a "dynamic process of 'establishment of unstable equilibria'" (Gledhill 2000, 77), not a static condition; "lite" readings that reduce it to structure/agency or hegemony/resistance lose what is specific to Gramsci (Crehan 2002, 199f).
- Consent is more than agreement: it combines "spontaneous" consent to the dominant group's direction with the enforcement of discipline when that consent fails (Hoare and Nowell 1971, 12); Reyna (2003, 210–211) cautions that consent is often a "big lie" and that "will" is itself shaped by cultural hegemony.
- The editors foreground *buon senso* ("good sense") as the element of common sense carrying seeds of emancipatory politics, and the organic intellectual's task as turning "incoherent common sense into coherent political narratives" (Crehan 2016, 31).
Methods
Conceptual/editorial introduction synthesizing Gramscian scholarship (Crehan, Gledhill, Roseberry, Hall, Reyna, Smith, and others) to frame a special issue of ethnographic contributions on Europe. The issue's articles cover anti-cosmopolitan ideology in rural Alpine regions (Lems), radical right-wing activism in Italy and Poland (Pasieka), migrant categorization in Vienna (Karasz), statelessness and intellectuals (Beyer), and religious charity and welfare retrenchment in Italy and Portugal (Matos and Pusceddu), with a philosophical commentary (Thelios) and an Afterword by Kate Crehan. No primary data collection or formal analysis is reported in the introduction itself.
Limitations
The text itself notes the translation problem that Italian *senso comune* is "far more neutral than the positively connotated common sense in English," prompting Gavin Smith to use "practical sense" for positive attributes (Smith 2014, 148). It also flags the risk of "proletarian exoticism" (Schäuble 2015, 110) — a "problematic romanticism of resistance that writes its hopes for revolutionary potential into the analysis" — and the tension between anthropologists' "effectively populist commitments to the common sense of common people at a time when that common sense can often look ugly" (Mazzarella 2019, 45). Evident from the text: as an introduction, it offers no empirical findings of its own, and its claims about the issue's articles are programmatic summaries rather than demonstrated results.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
18 Own interpretation · 7 No full text of the sources · 5 Sources not found · 5 Not checked yet · 5 No basis given · 1 Supported so far · 1 Partly supported · accuracy not yet measured
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“At the same time, these power-laden relational practices create a certain common sense (Macip-Ríos and Román-Burgos 2022).”
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites Macip-Ríos and Román-Burgos 2022 sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Abstract links hegemony, class ideology, and hierarchical relations to a neoliberal commonsense that the authors aim to challenge. It does not say that power-laden relational practices create that commonsense, so the causal part of the attribution is not established by our copy. (LLM, conf=0.76)
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Partly supported
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“For Gramsci, the role of an intellectual is not tied exclusively to academics.”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Austerity, for instance, is a case in point (Alves de Matos and Pusceddu 2021).”
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Alves de Matos and Pusceddu 2021 source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“The Angst that an analysis of power is reductive, determinist, and subsumes all other scholarly interests to manifestations of power is often unfounded when it comes to the questions raised by anthropologists working on a Gramscian concept of common sense (Patterson 2016).”
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Patterson 2016 source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“The first is frequently downplayed in more culturalist readings of Gramsci, yet is crucial for understanding the structural advantage of groups that control or have preferential access to strategic economic positions and the modes of production (Ciavolella 2018).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Ciavolella 2018 source
Checked before — its earlier verdict is held back until a new check runs.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Not checked yet
- Probably not a substantial claim. 36
- It may state two separate claims as one. 6
The sources with a verdict support this claim; the rest weren’t checked yet, have no full text we could read, or their verdicts aren’t rated yet.
In the paper
“By taking those claims seriously, importantly by empathy, not sympathy (Streinzer 2019), the ethnographer can cross hegemonic socio-political and ideological boundaries (Pasieka 2017).”
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Streinzer 2019 source
- Supportedcites Pasieka 2017 source
In “Taking Research Participants Seriously” (page unavailable), Pasieka urges ethnographers to engage thoughtfully with people on the opposite side of the political spectrum rather than treat them as moral outsiders. The concluding passage (page unavailable) describes this approach as a way to avoid building “empathy walls,” supporting the cited point about crossing socio-political and ideological boundaries. The empathy-versus-sympathy distinction is cited to Streinzer, not Pasieka. (LLM, conf=0.88)
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“An ethnographic application of Gramscian analyses of how some ideas and opinions become powerful and consequential in the world allows the connection of everyday thinking with a historical, materialist, and relational analysis of the play of power in establishing hegemonic narratives.”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Intellectuals are specific kinds of cultural specialists who form everyday consciousness by providing intellectual guidance.”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“the concrete configuration of which an analyst needs to find out and relate to the question of why specific ideas became part of a given understanding at a given time.”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence.
In the paper
“The key to analyzing common sense is understanding it as an ongoing relational and historic process formed from alliances in struggles about meaning (Demirovic 2019).”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Demirovic 2019
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The Gramscian notion of hegemony allows us to understand power as a shifting interplay between offers to subalterns to align themselves, the threat of sanctions, and the often de-facto dependence of subalterns on the hegemonic.”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“We foreground common sense as a key concept in terms of its potential for contemporary ethnography.”
- Also stated in: § Thinking with Gramsci Today: Gramscian perspectives in ethnographies of Europe · plain
“Common sense allows us to work through and with ethnography towards an understanding of hegemony and history, two other influential Gramscian concepts anthropologists work with and build on.”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Also stated in: § Thinking with Gramsci Today: Gramscian perspectives in ethnographies of Europe · plain
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The analytic potential for thinking about how specific ideas become pervasive and powerful is where we see Gramscian analyses as especially pertinent to contemporary anthropology.”
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Instead, a Gramscian understanding of common sense allows us to see the ambivalences and nuances of life in a world full of power and politics (Postero and Elinoff 2019, 11).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Postero and Elinoff 2019 source
Checked before — its earlier verdict is held back until a new check runs.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Not checked yet
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Hence, it is crucial to understand hegemony as an ongoing process of alliance formation.”
boosted- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The coercion/consent question is not about the subaltern willingly subordinating themselves to a ruling bloc.Instead, they are caught up in a situation in which non-consent may lead to coercion.”
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“For understanding the process of building and maintaining hegemony, two aspects seem particularly important: (1) the function of a historical bloc in production and (2) a certain degree of consent from the subaltern classes (Crehan 2002, 102).”
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Crehan 2002 source
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Gramsci, writing as an Italian Marxist about the rise of fascism, the historical praxis of organic intellectuals (Smith 1999, 256) inhabited a confident, progressive hope that, to paraphrase Marx's famous dictum, classes in themselves could be educated to become classes for themselves.”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Smith 1999
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“As scholars, we can understand this process as primarily a material one: a method of steering resources away from the larger (and poorer) part of the population and towards tax benefits, corporate subsidies, and other resources beneficial for capital-and asset-owning classes.”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
- Rests on an assumption: European states privatized assets and reconfigured social welfare towards activation and selective redistribution.
In the paper
“Intellectuals are not defined through their activities alone but by their specific roles in fragile hegemonies (Gottlieb 1989, 114).”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Gottlieb 1989
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“We find this a critical takeaway from what Gramsci can offer to a reconstructive analysis in anthropology.”
boosted- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence.
In the paper
“This element of common sense (senso comune) is good sensefoot_1 (buon senso) (Hoare and Nowell 1971, 634).”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Hoare and Nowell 1971
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
- Not matched
In the paper
“This specificity is critical as it problematizes generic readings of hegemony as static cultural domination (Jameson 2020, xi).”
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Jameson 2020 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
A claim is checked only against the cited paper’s full text, never its abstract, and none is available for its sources.
In the paper
“the ethnographic perspective focuses particularly well on the complex and contradictory character of senso comune and the various ways (populist) ideologization works in everyday life.”
What the sources say
boostedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“A crucial discursive arena for seeing the forces of power at play is common sensethe naturalness by which some matters appear and are presented as factual and given.”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Hegemony is a crucial term of Gramscian thinking.”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“These lose what is specific about Gramscian analysis, as its concepts are relational, social constructivist, and historically and geographically situated.”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In these, we find a comprehensive framework to see how ideas are shaped by the play of power that in turn shapes views.”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This conceptual advantage of understanding power and culture as a process, not as a condition, makes Gramscian analyses so attractive to contemporary political and economic anthropology.”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“As we read Gramsci, hegemony works through specific combinations of coercion and consent that may invite, sanction, educate, and discipline.”
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence.
In the paper
“The concept of the historical bloc allows one to go beyond the state in thinking about political power (Román-Burgos and Macip-Ríos 2022, 228).”
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Román-Burgos and Macip-Ríos 2022 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“This Gramscian perspective on class and culture is crucial for understanding the appeal of an anthropological take on the concept of common sense, which neither denies the influence of power nor understands culture as determined by it (Biesel 2021, 8).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Biesel 2021
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Yet, an analysis is incomplete without careful attention to the ideological processes of legitimizing, normalizing, or contesting the imagination of these historical forces as inevitable.”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Gramsci's relational and processual framework conceives of taken-for-granted common sense as carrying the seeds of an otherwise coherent and emancipatory politics.”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The articles furthermore show how crucial an understanding of hegemony in the current conjuncture is for making sense of the ascent and institutionalization of right-wing ideologies.”
boosted- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Common sense includes consent, complicity, or more or less hidden forms of contestation.”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“The common/good challenge in the English translation led Gavin Smith to use “practical sense” to refer to positive attributes of the English common sense(Smith 2014, 148).”
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Smith 2014, 148
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“With Gramscian analyses, the role of intellectuals is as fragile and contingent as his other concepts, subject to change and always ambivalent in terms of its function for complicity with hegemony or its attempts to overcome it (Smith 2004, 217).”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Smith 2004
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Together, the articles of the collection show the breadth and depth of work in ethnographies in and of Europe and how they engage Gramscian perspectives.”
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The Italian senso commune is far more neutral than the positively connotated common sense in English.”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“They show how common sense might be incoherent, but it is rarely arbitrary.”
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Finally, Gramsci's work sharpens attentiveness towards the delicate and continuous balancing act between the ethnographer's quest for a more or less egalitarian exchange (despite different views) on the one hand and power discrepancies on the other-conditions ethnographic fieldwork is constituted by.”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
The paper relies on this without support.
Anthropologists turn to Gramscian thinking to understand why and how these ideas resonate with and across highly diverse populations in different European countries.
“Anthropologists turn to Gramscian thinking to understand why and how they nevertheless resonate with and across highly diverse populations in different European countries.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Concerns about where our worlds are heading motivate critical analyses of ideologies as sets of ideas offering consistency and explanatory power.
“Concerns about where our worlds are heading motivate critical analyses of ideologies as sets of ideas offering consistency and explanatory power.”
The paper relies on this without support.
European states privatized assets and reconfigured social welfare towards activation and selective redistribution.
“European states privatized assets and reconfigured social welfare towards activation and selective redistribution.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Welfare retrenchment is beneficial to human flourishing, as it keeps social transfer recipients from becoming dependent on support (as an ideological framing).
“first, that welfare retrenchment is beneficial to human flourishing, as it keeps social transfer recipients from becoming dependent on support.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Political appropriations of migration and migrants as examples of common sense claims figure as efficient ideological tools.
“Third, political appropriations of (forced) migration and migrants as examples of a wide range of common sense claims to figure as efficient ideological tools.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Anthropologists focus precisely on the interplay between historical blocs of actors, hegemonies, and the commonsensical.
“Instead, anthropologists focus precisely on the interplay between historical blocs of actors, hegemonies, and the commonsensical.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Gramsci distinguishes a neutrally signified but rather neophobe and conservative senso commune with buon senso through the historical praxis of organic intellectuals.
“Hence Gramsci distinguishes a neutrally signified but rather neophobe and conservative senso commune with buon senso through the historical praxis of organic intellectuals.”
Citations
Cites
Marxism and the Interpretation of Culture
Thompson, J. W., Nelson, C., & Grossberg, L. (1989) · South Atlantic Review · doi:10.2307/3200554 · Cited by 2,741
The Hard Road to Renewal: Thatcherism and the Crisis of the Left
Hall, S. (1988) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 1,359
Hegemony and the Language of Contention
Roseberry, W. (1994) · Duke University Press eBooks · doi:10.1215/9780822396666-012 · Cited by 685
Gramsci, culture and anthropology
(2003) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.40-6488 · Cited by 542
Smith, G. J. D. (1989) · University of California Press eBooks · doi:10.1525/9780520912021 · Cited by 285
The Anthropology of Populism: Beyond the Liberal Settlement
Mazzarella, W. (2019) · Annual Review of Anthropology · doi:10.1146/annurev-anthro-102218-011412 · Cited by 219
La Fine Del Mondo Contributo All'analisi Delle Apocalissi Culturali
Martino, E. D., & Gallini, C. (1977) · Einaudi eBooks · Cited by 189
Gramsci's Common Sense: Inequality and Its Narratives
Crehan, K. (2016) · doi:10.1215/9780822373742 · Cited by 149
Confronting the Present : Towards a Politically Engaged Anthropology
(1999) · Bloomsbury Academic eBooks · doi:10.5040/9781474214643 · Cited by 126
Narotzky, S., & Smith, G. J. D. (2006) · University of California Press eBooks · doi:10.1525/9780520939011 · Cited by 71
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- De Martino, Ernesto. 1949. Intorno a Una Storia Del Mondo Popolare Subalterno. Societá 5 (3): 411–435.
- Gottlieb, Roger S. 1989. Antonio Gramsci (1891–1937). In An anthology of Western Marxism: From Lukács and Gramsci to socialist-feminism, ed. Roger S. Gottlieb, 112–119. New York: Oxford University Press.
- Hoare, Quentin, and Geoffrey Nowell, eds. 1971. Gramsci, Antonio: Selections from the Prison Notebooks. London: Lawrence & Wishart.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Rational purpose requirement and sustainability reporting assurance
Conradie, P., & Barac, K. (2025) · Sustainability Accounting Management and Policy Journal · doi:10.1108/sampj-04-2024-0399 · Cited by 7
Nagy, K. (2023) · Intersections · doi:10.17356/ieejsp.v9i4.1127 · Cited by 4
Aspired communities: Reconsidering community in light of the temporal dimensionality of social life
Posio, P. (2024) · Anthropological Theory · doi:10.1177/14634996241231667 · Cited by 4
The dynamics of ‘limited hybridity’ in migration: the case of Zera Beta Israel from Ethiopia
Talmi-Cohn, R. (2026) · Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies · doi:10.1080/1369183x.2026.2702668 · Cited by 2
After Arbeitsschutzkontrollgesetz. Strikes and organic intellectuals in the German meat industry
Ana, D., & Voicu, Ș. (2023) · SEER · doi:10.5771/1435-2869-2023-2-227 · Cited by 2
After Arbeitsschutzkontrollgesetz. Strikes and Organic Intellectuals in the German Meat Industry
Ana, D., & Voicu, Ș. (2023) · Sociologie Romaneasca · doi:10.33788/sr.21.1.5 · Cited by 1
Truffer, J., & Tsakmaklis, D. (2025) · Dialectical Anthropology · doi:10.1007/s10624-025-09801-y
Uncertainty and Resonances as Pedagogical Allies
Bernardi, F. (2026) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-981-95-0043-7_4
Hegemony and Ethnic Politics among the Bodos: A Gramscian Perspective
Basumatary, G. (2026) · International Journal For Multidisciplinary Research · doi:10.36948/ijfmr.2026.v08i03.81149
Metadata
- Authors
- Streinzer, A., & Tosic, J.
- Affiliations
- University of St.Gallen (CH)
- ORCID
- Streinzer, Andreas
- Venue
- Dialectical Anthropology
- Published
- 2022-12
- Volume
- 46
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 385-394
- ISSN
- 0304-4092 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-0786
- OpenAlex
- W4312222461
- Cited by
- 9
- References
- 29
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Dialectical Anthropology (publishedVersion)
- Alexandria (UniSG) (University of St.Gallen) (acceptedVersion)
- Alexandria (UniSG) (University of St.Gallen) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Political theory and Gramsci
- Social Sciences › Anthropology › Anthropological Studies and Insights
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Sociology and Norbert Elias
- Keywords
- Antonio Gramsci, common sense, hegemony, power hierarchies, moralization, materialism, ideology, Stuart Hall, Thatcherism, neoliberalism, power structures
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-11-10, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).
A second model labelled each claim on 2026-11-10 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).
Cited sources are checked with a language model’s help (gpt-6-sol).
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
