CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 105Online and Blended LearningVirtual Reality Applications and ImpactsInnovative Teaching and Learning Methods

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Measuring perceived social presence in distributed learning groups

Open access
Kreijns, Karel, Kirschner, Paul A., Jochems, Wim, van Buuren, Hans·2011·Education and Information Technologies
DOI 10.1007/s10639-010-9135-7
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10639-010-9135-7

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 52

  1. Argyle, M., & Dean, J. (1965). Eye contact, distance and affiliation. Sociometry, 28, 289–304. · DOI · Paper page
  2. Cobb, S. C. (2009). Social presence and online learning: a current view from a research perspective. Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 8(3), 241–254.
  3. Fiedler, F. E. (1962). Leader attitudes, group climate, and group creativity. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 65, 308–318. · DOI
  4. Fiedler, F. E. (1967). A theory of leadership effectiveness. New York: McGraw-Hill.
  5. Fulk, J., Schmitz, J., & Steinfield, C. W. (1990). A social influence model of technology use. In J. Fulk & C. W. Steinfield (Eds.), Organizations and communication technology (pp. 117–140). London and Newbury Park: Sage. · DOI
  6. Garramone, G. M., Harris, A. C., & Anderson, R. (1986). Uses of political computer bulletin boards. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 30, 325–339. · DOI
  7. Garrison, D. R. (1993). A cognitive constructivist view of distance education: an analysis of teaching-learning assumptions. Distance Education, 14, 199–211. · DOI
  8. Garrison, D. R. (1997a). Computer conferencing: the post-industrial age of distance education. Open Learning, 12(2), 3–11. · DOI
  9. Garrison, D. R. (1997b). Computer conferencing in distance education: Cognitive and social presence issues. In Proceedings of the 18th World conference of the International council for distance education (ICDE): The new learning environment: A global perspective. Pennsylvania: Pennsylvania State University.
  10. Garrison, D. R., & Anderson, T. (2003). E-learning in the 21st century. London: Routledge Falmer. · DOI
  11. Gunawardena, C. N. (1995). Social presence theory and implications for interaction and collaborative learning in computer conferences. International Journal of Educational Telecommunications, 1(2/3), 147–166.
  12. Gunawardena, C. N., & Zittle, F. (1997). Social presence as a predictor of satisfaction within a computer mediated conferencing environment. American Journal of Distance Education, 11(3), 8–25. · DOI · Paper page
  13. Henninger, M., & Viswanathan, V. (2004). Social presence in online tutoring: what we know and what we should know. In P. Gerjets, P. A. Kirschner, J. Elen, & R. Joiner (Eds.), Proceedings of the first joint meeting of the EARLI SIGs Instructional Design and Learning and Instruction with Computers (CD-ROM). Tuebingen: Knowledge Media Research Center.
  14. Hills, A. (2005). Social presence and communication quality in videoconferencing. Unpublished bachelor dissertation, University of Otago, New Zealand.
  15. Hiltz, S. R. (1994). The virtual classroom: Learning without limits via computer networks. Norwood: Ablex.
  16. Jacques, D. (1992). Learning in groups (2nd ed.). London: Kogan Page.
  17. Jessup, L. M., Connolly, T., & Tansik, D. A. (1990). Toward a theory of automated group work: the deindividuating effects of anonymity. Small Group Research, 21, 333–348. · DOI
  18. Johnson, R. T., Johnson, D. W., & Stanne, M. B. (1985). Effects of cooperative, competitive, and individualistic goal structures on computer-assisted instruction. Journal of Education & Psychology, 77, 668–677. · DOI
  19. Kearsley, G. (1995). The nature and value of interaction in distance learning. (ACSDE Research Monograph No. 12, pp. 83–92). University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University, American Center for the Study of Distance Education.
  20. Koh, J., Kim, Y.-G., Butler, B., & Bock, G.-W. (2007). Encouraging participation in virtual communities. Communications of the ACM, 50(2), 69–73.
  21. Kreijns, K., Kirschner, P. A., & Jochems, W. (2002). The sociability of computer-supported collaborative learning environments. Journal of Education Technology & Society, 5(1), 8–22.
  22. Kreijns, K., Kirschner, P. A., & Jochems, W. (2003). Identifying the pitfalls for social interaction in computer-supported collaborative learning environments: a review of the research. Computers in Human Behavior, 19, 335–353. · DOI
  23. Kreijns, K., Kirschner, P. A., Jochems, W., & Van Buuren, H. (2004). Measuring perceived quality of social space in distributed learning groups. Computers in Human Behavior, 20, 607–632. · DOI
  24. Kreijns, K., Kirschner, P. A., Jochems, W., & Buuren, V. (2007). Measuring perceived sociability of computer-supported collaborative learning environments. Computers & Education, 49, 176–192. · DOI
  25. Liu, S. Y., Gomez, J., & Yen, C.-J. (2009). Community college online course retention and final grade: predictablility of social presence. Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 8(2), 165–182.
  26. Lombard, M. & Ditton, T. (1997). At the heart of it all: The concept of presence. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 3(2). Retrieved January 29, 2003, from http://www.ascusc.org/jcmc/vol3/issue2/lombard.html .
  27. Lowenthal, P. R. (2010). The evolution and influence of social presence theory on online learning. In T. T. Kidd (Ed.), Online education and adult learning: New frontiers for teaching practices (pp. 124–134). Hershey: IGI Global. · DOI
  28. Price, J. L., & Mueller, C. W. (1986). Handbook of organizational measurement. Marshfield: Pitman.
  29. Rice, R. E. (1993). Media appropriateness: using social presence theory to compare traditional and new media. Human Communication Research, 19, 451–484. · DOI
  30. Rourke, L., & Anderson, T. (2002). Exploring social communication in asynchronous, text-based computer conferencing. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 13, 259–275.
  31. Rourke, L., Anderson, T., Garrison, D. R., & Archer, W. (1999). Assessing social presence in asynchronous, text-based computer conferences. Journal of Distance Education, 14(3), 51–70.
  32. Shen, K. N., Khalifa, M., Yu, A. Y. (2006). Supporting social interaction in virtual communities: Role of social presence. Paper presented at the 12th Americas conference on Information systems. Acapulco, Mexico.
  33. Short, J., Williams, E., & Christie, B. (1976). The social psychology of telecommunications. London: Wiley.
  34. Slavin, R. (1995). Cooperative learning: Theory, research, and practice (2nd ed.). Needham Heights: Ally and Bacon.
  35. Soller, A. L., Lesgold, A., Linton, F., Goodman, B. (1999). What makes peer interaction effective? Modeling effective communication in an intelligent CSCL. In Proceedings of the 1999 AAAI fall symposium: Psychological models of communication in collaborative systems (pp. 116–123). Cape-Cod, MA.
  36. Spears, R., Postmes, T., Wolbert, A., Lea, M., & Rogers, P. (2000). Social psychological influence of ICT on society and their policy implications [Electronic version]. Amsterdam: Infodrome.
  37. Stacey, E. (2000). Quality online participation : establishing social presence. In Research in distance education 5: Revised papers from the 5th Research in distance education conference (pp. 138–153). Melbourne, Vict. :Deakin University.
  38. Stacey, E. (2002). Social presence online: networking learners at a distance. Education and Information Technologies, 7, 287–294. · DOI
  39. Steinfield, C. (1986). Computer-mediated communication in an organizational setting: Explaining task-related and socioemotional uses. In M. L. McLaughlin (Ed.), Communication yearbook 9 (pp. 777–804). Newbury Park: Sage.
  40. Swan, K. (2002). Building learning communities in online courses: the importance of interaction. Education, Communication and Information, 2(1), 23–50. · DOI
  41. Tu, C. H. (2000a). On-line learning migration: from social learning theory to social presence theory in a CMC environment. Journal of Network and Computer Applications, 23(1), 27–37. · DOI
  42. Tu, C. H. (2000b). Critical examination of factors affecting interaction on CMC. Journal of Network and Computer Applications, 23(1), 39–58. · DOI
  43. Tu, C. H. (2001). How Chinese perceive social presence: an examination of an online learning environment. Educational Media International, 38(1), 45–60. · DOI
  44. Tu, C. H. (2002a). The relationship between social presence and online privacy. Internet and Higher Education, 5, 293–318. · DOI
  45. Tu, C. H. (2002b). The measurement of social presence in an online learning environment. International Journal on E-learning, 1(2), 34–45.
  46. Tu, C. H. (2002c). The impacts of text-based CMC on online social presence. The Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 1(2), 1–24.
  47. Tu, C. H., & McIsaac, M. (2002). An examination of social presence to increase interaction in online classes. American Journal of Distance Education, 16(3), 131–150. · DOI
  48. Walther, J. B. (1992). Interpersonal effects in computer-mediated interaction: a relational perspective. Communication Research, 19(1), 52–90. · DOI
  49. Walther, J. B., & Burgoon, J. K. (1992). Relational communication in computer-mediated interaction. Human Communication Research, 19(1), 50–88. · DOI
  50. Wiener, M., & Mehrabian, A. (1968). Language within language: Immediacy, a channel in verbal communication. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
  51. Witmer, D. F. (1997). Risky business: why people feel safe in sexually explicit on-line communication. Journal of Computer Mediated Communication, 2(4). Retrieved January 29, 2005, from http://www.ascusc.org/jcmc/vol2/issue4/witmer2.html .
  52. Yoo, Y., & Alavi, M. (2001). Media and group cohesion: relative influences on social presence, task participation, and group cohesiveness. MIS Quarterly, 25, 371–390. · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Kreijns, K., Kirschner, P. A., Jochems, W., & van Buuren, H.
Affiliations
  • Fontys University of Applied Sciences (NL)
  • Open University of the Netherlands (NL)
  • Eindhoven University of Technology (NL)
Corresponding author
Kreijns, Karel
ORCID
Venue
Education and Information Technologies
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2010-07-03
Volume
16
Issue
4
Pages
365-381
ISSN
  • 1360-2357 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-7608
DOI
10.1007/s10639-010-9135-7
OpenAlex
W2136190688
Cited by
105
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 1
FWCI
18.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • Education and Information Technologies (publishedVersion)
  • TU/e Research Portal (publishedVersion)
  • DSpace (Open University in the Netherlands) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • TU/e Research Portal (submittedVersion)
  • DSpace (Open University in the Netherlands) (submittedVersion)
  • DSpace (Open University in the Netherlands) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Online and Blended Learning
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
Keywords
perceived social presence, computer-supported collaborative learning, scale development, scale validation, nomological network, social interaction in learning, knowledge construction, self-report measures

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review