Cited by 82Online and Blended LearningInnovative Teaching and Learning MethodsEducational Leadership and Administration

Promoting effective e-learning practices through the constructivist pedagogy

Keengwe, Jared, Onchwari, Grace, Agamba, Joachim·2014·Education and Information Technologies

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10639-013-9260-1

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Keengwe, J., Onchwari, G., & Agamba, J.
Affiliations
  • University of North Dakota (US)
  • Idaho State University (US)
Corresponding author
Keengwe, Jared
Venue
Education and Information Technologies
Published
2013-05-09
Volume
19
Issue
4
Pages
887-898
ISSN
  • 1360-2357 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-7608
OpenAlex
W2070052318
Cited by
82
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 2
FWCI
22.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Education and Information Technologies (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Online and Blended Learning
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
  • Social Sciences › Education › Educational Leadership and Administration
Keywords
online learning, constructivism, constructivist teaching, cooperative learning, good teaching practices, learning environment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review