Cited by 494Innovative Teaching MethodsInnovative Teaching and Learning MethodsOnline and Blended Learning

Effects of the flipped classroom instructional strategy on students’ learning outcomes: a meta-analysis

Cheng, Li, Ritzhaupt, Albert D., Antonenko, Pavlo·2019·Educational Technology Research and Development

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11423-018-9633-7

Cites

124 of 124 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Only peer-reviewed journal studies were included, as their results are believed to be of sufficient quality.

    “Only peer-reviewed journal studies were included, as their results are believed to be of sufficient quality (Cheng et al., 2019a;Hew & Lo, 2018a;Korpershoek et al., 2016;Lo et al., 2017).”
  • The finding that effect sizes decrease with longer duration is consistent with previous meta-analyses.

    “This result was consistent with the findings of previous metaanalyses.”
  • Previous meta-analyses found that effects gradually decreased as durations increased.

    “In meta-analyses that compared studies that were shorter and longer than a semester (Cheng et al., 2019b;Shi, Ma, et al., 2020) and compared studies that lasted 1-4, 5-8, 9-12, 13-16 weeks, and more than 16 weeks (Karagöl & Esen, 2019;Tutal & Yazar, 2021), the effects gradually decreased as the durations increased.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

6 of the 130 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cheng, L., Ritzhaupt, A. D., & Antonenko, P.
Affiliations
University of Florida (US)
Corresponding author
Ritzhaupt, Albert D.
Venue
Educational Technology Research and Development
Published
2018-10-29
Volume
67
Issue
4
Pages
793-824
ISSN
  • 1042-1629 (ISSN-L)
  • 1556-6501
OpenAlex
W2899228373
Cited by
494
References
130
Citations by year
2026: 30 · 2025: 52 · 2024: 90 · 2023: 100 · 2022: 88 · 2021: 82 · 2020: 44 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 1
FWCI
13.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Educational Technology Research and Development (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Innovative Teaching Methods
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
  • Social Sciences › Education › Online and Blended Learning
Keywords
flipped classroom, learning outcomes, teaching methods, traditional classroom comparison, cognitive outcomes, effect size, publication bias, teaching practice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review