The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Social media in higher education: A literature review of Facebook
Open accessAbstract
The rapid adoption of social media technologies has resulted in a fundamental shift in the way communication and collaboration take place. As staff and students use social media technologies in their personal lives, it is important to explore how social media technologies are being used as an educational tool. The aim of this paper is to analyse the role of social media, in particular, Facebook, as an educational tool in higher education. Through a review of the literature, this paper explores the myriad ways in which Facebook is being used as an educational instrument for learning and teaching. Multiple benefits of Facebook usage for learning and teaching have been identified such as increased teacher-student and student-student interaction, improved performance, the convenience of learning and higher engagement. The paper also highlights the potential problems and limitations of Facebook usage ranging from educators’ dominance to privacy concerns. Finally, Facebook usage guidelines that can be adopted by educators to encourage social media adoption are proposed. As social media usage continues to grow in higher education, future empirical research is warranted.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Social network sites: definition, history, and scholarship
boyd, D. M., & Ellison, N. B. (2007) · Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication · doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00393.x · Cited by 16,251
Ellison, N. B., Steinfield, C., & Lampe, C. (2007) · Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication · doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00367.x · Cited by 9,939
Toward a hierarchical model of intrinsic and extrinsic motivation
Vallerand, R. J. (1997) · Advances in experimental social psychology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2601(08)60019-2 · Cited by 3,198 · cited 1×
“Intrinsic motivation tends to yield most positive results in the learning process (Vallerand 1997).”
Background
Cited by
Snapping, pinning, liking or texting: Investigating social media in higher education beyond Facebook
Manca, S. (2020) · The Internet and Higher Education · doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2019.100707 · Cited by 347
Editorial: Artificial Intelligence is Awesome, but Good Teaching Should Always Come First.
Crawford, J., Vallis, C., Yang, J., Fitzgerald, R., O'Dea, C., & Cowling, M. (2024) · Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice · doi:10.53761/1.20.7.01 · Cited by 18
Barrot, J. S., & Acomular, D. R. (2022) · International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education · doi:10.1186/s41239-022-00357-3 · Cited by 15
EFL teachers’ perceptions of teacherpreneurs’ persuasive techniques on Instagram
Naqdi Babaee, N., Shamsaee, S., & Shams, M. A. (2026) · Discover Psychology · doi:10.1007/s44202-026-00899-x
Metadata
- Authors
- Chugh, R., & Ruhi, U.
- Venue
- Education and Information Technologies
- Published
- 2017-06-22
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 605-616
- ISSN
- 1360-2357 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-7608
- OpenAlex
- W2675431578
- Cited by
- 447
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 59.09
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
