Technological aspect factors of E-learning readiness in higher education institutions: Delphi technique
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Open online resources have recently been actively developed and used, implementing techniques from individual tasks and tests to comprehensive courses or modules with development of necessary abilities.
“Open online resources were recently actively developed and used, implementing a variety of techniques, starting with individual tasks and tests and finishing with comprehensive courses (modules) with the development of the necessary abilities [32]”
From Digital Learning and Digital Institution in Higher Education (2023) · cites this paper as [32]
Cites
The Delphi Technique: Making Sense of Consensus
Hsu, C.-C., & Sandford, B. A. (2007) · University of Massachusetts Amherst · doi:10.7275/pdz9-th90 · Cited by 4,500 · cited 2× · see citing works
“Thus, it enables the study to be conducted efficiently and effectively (Hsu and Sandford 2007).”
BackgroundMethodThe role of readiness factors in E-learning outcomes: An empirical study
Keramati, A., Afshari-Mofrad, M., & Kamrani, A. (2011) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2011.04.005 · Cited by 208 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Digital Learning and Digital Institution in Higher Education
Alenezi, M. (2023) · Education Sciences · doi:10.3390/educsci13010088 · Cited by 376 · see citing works
eLearning Acceptance and Adoption Challenges in Higher Education
Ahmad, S., Mohd Noor, A. S., Alwan, A. A., Gulzar, Y., Khan, W. Z., & Reegu, F. A. (2023) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su15076190 · Cited by 95 · see citing works
Madni, S. H. H., Ali, J., Husnain, H. A., Masum, M. H., Mustafa, S., Shuja, J., Maray, M., & Hosseini, S. (2022) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.915596 · Cited by 58 · see citing works
- Authors
- Al-araibi, A. A. M., Mahrin, M. N. B., & Yusoff, R. C. M.
- Affiliations
- University of Technology Malaysia (MY)
- Corresponding author
- Al-araibi, Asma Ali Mosa
- Venue
- Education and Information Technologies
- Published
- 2018-08-16
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 567-590
- ISSN
- 1360-2357 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-7608
- OpenAlex
- W2886699977
- Cited by
- 152
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 30 · 2022: 40 · 2021: 29 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1
- FWCI
- 20.16
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Education and Information Technologies (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Educational Technology and E-Learning
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Educational Innovations and Challenges
- Social Sciences › Education › Online and Blended Learning
- Keywords
- e-learning readiness, technological factors, higher education institutions, e-learning implementation, information and communication technologies, technology adoption
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
