The effects of the flipped classroom model designed according to the ARCS motivation strategies on the students’ motivation and academic achievement levels
Open accessIntegrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Most studies in the meta-analysis were conducted within 8 weeks; one lasted half a semester and two lasted only a few days.
“Most of the studies in our meta-analysis were conducted within 8 weeks (Cabi & Emine, 2018;Karabatak & Polat, 2020;Meng et al., 2022;Muzyk et al., 2015;Senousy et al., 2017;Wang et al., 2022;Wilson & Hobbs, 2023), and one studies lasted for half a semester (Chien & Hsieh, 2018) and two studies only lasted for a few days (Arya et al., 2020;Casselman et al., 2020).”
From Exploring the Effectiveness of Flipped Classroom on STEM Student Achievement: A Meta-analysis (2024) · cites this paper as Karabatak & Polat, 2020
Cites
Development and use of the ARCS model of instructional design
Keller, J. M. (1987) · Journal of Instructional Development · doi:10.1007/bf02905780 · Cited by 2,332 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Exploring the Effectiveness of Flipped Classroom on STEM Student Achievement: A Meta-analysis
Gong, J., Cai, S., & Cheng, M. (2024) · Technology, Knowledge and Learning · doi:10.1007/s10758-023-09700-7 · Cited by 42 · see citing works
- Authors
- Karabatak, S., & Polat, H.
- Affiliations
- Fırat University (TR)
- Corresponding author
- Karabatak, Songül
- Venue
- Education and Information Technologies
- Published
- 2019-08-11
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 1475-1495
- ISSN
- 1360-2357 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-7608
- OpenAlex
- W2968074690
- Cited by
- 58
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 4
- FWCI
- 15.51
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- hdl.handle.net
- Licence
- Locations
- Education and Information Technologies (publishedVersion)
- DSpace - FIRAT (Fırat University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Innovative Teaching Methods
- Social Sciences › Education › Online and Blended Learning
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
- Keywords
- flipped classroom, ARCS motivation model, student motivation, academic performance, distance education, traditional classroom instruction, instructional design
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review