CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 192Online and Blended LearningEnglish Language Learning and TeachingEFL/ESL Teaching and Learning

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 57 of the 58 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Finding satisfaction: intrinsic motivation for synchronous and asynchronous communication in the online language learning context

Open access
Bailey, Daniel, Almusharraf, Norah, Hatcher, Ryan·2021·Education and Information Technologies
DOI 10.1007/s10639-020-10369-zPMC PMC7641871
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

Intrinsic value is related to intrinsic motivation and influences learners' decisions to begin, continue, and return to learning tasks. In the context of a fully online foreign language English course, we used structural equation modeling to explore the motivation for asynchronous collaborative writing practice, motivation for video-synchronous speaking practice, course satisfaction, and the mediating effect course satisfaction has on behavioral intentions to use language learning technology. Cross-sectional survey results (n = 186) revealed that students who were motivated by asynchronous online collaborative writing were more likely to enjoy online learning in general when compared to students who reported motivation for video-synchronous online speaking practice. Moreover, the relationship between motivation for collaborative writing and behavioral intentions to use language learning technology was mediated by course satisfaction. A follow-up open-ended survey (n = 65) revealed that students held positive views for online second language writing and speaking practice overall but for distinctly different reasons. The findings are discussed in terms of their theoretical implications for modeling e-learning approaches with significance for promoting instructional training effectiveness and transformative learning.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10639-020-10369-z

Cites

57 of 57 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 58 references

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Wilson, K. (2016). Smart choice (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Bailey, D., Almusharraf, N., & Hatcher, R.
Affiliations
  • Konkuk University (KR)
  • Prince Sultan University (SA)
  • Hannam University (KR)
Corresponding author
Almusharraf, Norah
ORCID
Venue
Education and Information Technologies
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2020-11-05
Volume
26
Issue
3
Pages
2563-2583
ISSN
  • 1360-2357 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-7608
DOI
10.1007/s10639-020-10369-z
PMC
PMC7641871
OpenAlex
W3095305349
Cited by
192
References
58
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 34 · 2024: 41 · 2023: 42 · 2022: 40 · 2021: 20
FWCI
38.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • Education and Information Technologies (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Online and Blended Learning
  • Social Sciences › Education › English Language Learning and Teaching
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
Keywords
intrinsic motivation, course satisfaction, asynchronous communication, synchronous communication, online language learning, collaborative writing, videoconferencing, second language speaking, behavioral intention, technology-enhanced language learning, online learning, transformative learning

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review