Does Generative Artificial Intelligence Improve Students’ Higher-Order Thinking? A Meta-Analysis Based on 29 Experiments and Quasi-Experiments
Open accessAbstract
The widespread application of Generative Artificial Intelligence (Gen-AI) is transforming educational practices and driving pedagogical innovation. While cultivating higher-order thinking (HOT) represents a central educational goal, its achievement remains an ongoing challenge. Current evidence regarding the impact of Gen-AI on HOT is relatively fragmented, lacking systematic integration, particularly in the analysis of moderating variables. To address this gap, a meta-analysis approach was employed, integrating data from 29 experimental and quasi-experimental studies to quantitatively assess the overall impact of Gen-AI on learners’ HOT and to examine potential moderating factors. The analysis revealed that Gen-AI exerts a moderate positive effect on HOT, with the most significant improvement observed in problem-solving abilities, followed by critical thinking, while its effect on creativity is relatively limited. Moderation analyses further indicated that the impact of Gen-AI is significantly influenced by experimental duration and learners’ self-regulated learning (SRL) abilities: effects were strongest when interventions lasted 8–16 weeks, and learners with higher SRL capacities benefited more substantially. Based on the research findings, this study proposed that Gen-AI should be systematically integrated as a targeted instructional tool to foster HOT. Medium- to long-term interventions (8–16 weeks) are recommended to enhance learners’ problem-solving and critical thinking abilities. At the same time, effective approaches should also be explored to promote creative thinking through Gen-AI within existing pedagogical frameworks. Furthermore, individual learner differences should be accounted for by adopting dynamic and personalized scaffolding strategies to foster SRL, thereby maximizing the educational potential of Gen-AI in cultivating innovative talents.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
GenAI exerts a moderate positive effect on higher-order thinking, with the strongest gains for problem-solving and critical thinking and weaker effects for creativity.
“Metaanalytic evidence further suggests that GenAI exerts a moderate positive effect on higher-order thinking, with the strongest gains observed for problem-solving and critical thinking, and weaker effects for creativity (Zhao et al., 2025).”
From <b>Effects of Partial vs. Full Cognitive Offloading with Generative AI on Learning Retention </b> (2026) · cites this paper as Zhao et al., 2025
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
1 retracted
Wang, J., & Fan, W. (2025) · Humanities and Social Sciences Communications · doi:10.1057/s41599-025-04787-y · Cited by 322 · see citing works
RetractedCohen, J. (1992) · Current Directions in Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/1467-8721.ep10768783 · Cited by 5,870 · see citing works
Peters, J. L., Sutton, A. J., Jones, D. R., Abrams, K. R., & Rushton, L. (2008) · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2007.11.010 · Cited by 2,053 · see citing works
The effectiveness of online and blended learning: A meta-analysis of the empirical literature
Means, B., Toyama, Y., Murphy, R., & Baki, M. (2013) · Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education · doi:10.1177/016146811311500307 · Cited by 1,638 · see citing works
Chatbots in Education and Research: A Critical Examination of Ethical Implications and Solutions
Kooli, C. (2023) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su15075614 · Cited by 666 · cited 1× · see citing works
“In addition, research by Kooli (2023) and Maniktala et al. (2023) has suggested that frequent reliance on Gen-AI-based dialogs may negatively impact students’ academic autonomy and capacity for knowledge internalization, fostering cognitive dependence and diminishing their ability to solve problems…”
Lee, H.-Y., Chen, P.-H., Wang, W.-S., Huang, Y.-M., & Wu, T.-T. (2024) · International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education · doi:10.1186/s41239-024-00447-4 · Cited by 273 · cited 5× · see citing works
“Second, guided Gen-AI interaction should be implemented, using carefully designed prompts to steer AI toward providing conceptual frameworks or reasoning processes rather than direct answers, thereby fostering sustained active participation and deeper cognitive engagement (Lee et al. 2024).”
InfluentialHoly or Unholy? Interview with Open AI’s ChatGPT
Iskender, A. (2023) · European Journal of Tourism Research · doi:10.54055/ejtr.v34i.3169 · Cited by 260 · see citing works
Shahzad, M. F., Xu, S., & Zahid, H. (2025) · Education and Information Technologies · doi:10.1007/s10639-024-12949-9 · Cited by 204 · cited 1× · see citing works
“This aligns with findings by Shahzad et al. (2024), who demonstrated that the integration of Gen-AI significantly enhances the effectiveness of PBL and supports the development of student creativity.”
Bailey, D., Almusharraf, N., & Hatcher, R. (2021) · Education and Information Technologies · doi:10.1007/s10639-020-10369-z · Cited by 192 · see citing works
Zheng, L., Niu, J., Zhong, L., & Gyasi, J. F. (2023) · Interactive Learning Environments · doi:10.1080/10494820.2021.2015693 · Cited by 183 · see citing works
Critical thinking in the age of generative AI
Larson, B. Z., Moser, C., Caza, A., Muehlfeld, K., & Colombo, L. A. (2024) · Academy of Management Learning & Education · doi:10.5465/amle.2024.0338 · Cited by 161 · see citing works
Zhou, X., Teng, D., & Al-Samarraie, H. (2024) · Education Sciences · doi:10.3390/educsci14121302 · Cited by 119 · cited 2× · see citing works
“Zhou et al. (2024) identified self-regulated learning (SRL) as a critical mediating variable linking Gen-AI use to the enhancement of critical thinking and problem-solving skills.”
Rusandi, M. A., Ahman, Saripah, I., Khairun, D. Y., & Mutmainnah (2023) · Journal of Public Health · doi:10.1093/pubmed/fdad049 · Cited by 115 · see citing works
Zhang, Y., & Zhu, Y. (2024) · Educational Studies · doi:10.1080/03055698.2022.2107873 · Cited by 75 · see citing works
Hou, C., Zhu, G., & Sudarshan, V. (2025) · British Journal of Educational Technology · doi:10.1111/bjet.13613 · Cited by 72 · cited 1× · see citing works
“…or misleading information compels students to scrutinize the validity and reliability of the outputs, thereby reinforcing their critical evaluation skills, reducing their reliance on Gen-AI, and increasing the likelihood of meaningful interactions with Gen-AI (Qi et al. 2024; Hou et al. 2025).”
How and for whom using generative AI affects creativity: A field experiment
Sun, S., Li, Z. A., Foo, M.-D., Zhou, J., & Lu, J. G. (2025) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/apl0001296 · Cited by 57 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Studies indicate that excessive reliance on AI-generated content may weaken learners’ self-directed learning and self-regulation capabilities (Sun et al. 2025).”
Du, X., Du, M., Zhou, Z., & Bai, Y. (2025) · International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education · doi:10.1186/s41239-025-00534-0 · Cited by 44 · see citing works
Wang, W.-S., Lin, C.-J., Lee, H.-Y., Huang, Y.-M., & Wu, T.-T. (2025) · Education and Information Technologies · doi:10.1007/s10639-025-13557-x · Cited by 43 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 55
- Adijaya Made Aryawan Widiana I Wayan Parwata I Gusti Lanang Agung Antara I Gede Wahyu Suwela Bloom’s taxonomy revision-oriented learning activities to improve procedural capabilities and learning outcomes International Journal of Educational Methodology 2023 9 261 70 10.12973/ijem.9.1.261 · DOI
- Alkhatib Omar J. An Effective Assessment Method of Higher-Order Thinking Skills (Problem-Solving, Critical Thinking, Creative Thinking, and Decision-Making) in Engineering and Humanities Paper presented at 2022 Advances in Science and Engineering Technology International Conferences (ASET) Dubai, United Arab Emirates February 21–24 2022 1 6 10.1109/ASET53988.2022.9734856 · DOI
- Alzubi Ali Abbas Falah Nazim Mohd Alyami Naji Do AI-generative tools kill or nurture creativity in EFL teaching and learning? Education and Information Technologies 2025 30 15147 84 10.1007/s10639-025-13409-8 · DOI · Paper page
- Anderson Lorin W. Krathwohl David R. A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and Assessing: A Revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: Complete Edition Addison Wesley Longman, Inc. Albany 2001 Available online: http://eduq.info/xmlui/handle/11515/18824 (accessed on 6 November 2015)
- Arista Artika Shuib Liyana Ismail Maizatul Akmar A glimpse of ChatGPT: An introduction to features, challenges, and threats in higher education Paper presented at Informatics, Multimedia, Cyber and Information Systems Conference Jakarta Selatan, Indonesia November 7–8 2023 694 98 10.1109/ICIMCIS60089.2023.10349057 · DOI
- Borge M. Smith B. K. Aldemir T. Using generative AI as a simulation to support higher-order thinking International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning 2024 19 479 532 10.1007/s11412-024-09437-0 · DOI
- Bower Matt Vlachopoulos Panos A critical analysis of technology—Enhanced learning design frameworks British Journal of Educational Technology 2018 49 981 97 10.1111/bjet.12668 · DOI
- Cam Emre Kiyici Mübin The impact of robotics-assisted programming education on academic success, problem-solving skills, and motivation Journal of Educational Technology and Online Learning 2022 5 47 65 10.31681/jetol.1028825 · DOI
- Chiu Thomas K. F. Moorhouse Benjamin Luke Chai Ching Sing Ismailov Murod Teacher support and student motivation to learn with Artificial Intelligence (AI) based chatbot Interactive Learning Environments 2023 32 3240 56 10.1080/10494820.2023.2172044 · DOI · Paper page
- Costa Alexandra R. Lima Natércia Viegas Clara Caldeira Amélia Critical minds: Enhancing education with ChatGPT Cogent Education 2024 11 2415286 10.1080/2331186X.2024.2415286 · DOI
- Deng Ruiqi Jiang Maoli Yu Xinlu Lu Yuyan Liu Shasha Does ChatGPT enhance student learning? A systematic review and meta-analysis of experimental studies Computers & Education 2025 227 105224 10.1016/j.compedu.2024.105224 · DOI · Paper page
- Ganesh D. Kumar M. Sunil Reddy P. Venkateswarlu Sadam Kavitha Murthy D. Sudarsana Implementation of AI pop bots and its allied applications for designing efficient curriculum in early childhood education International Journal of Early Childhood Special Education 2022 14 2282 92 10.9756/INT-JECSE/V14I3.271 · DOI
- García-Martínez Inmaculada Fernández-Batanero José María Fernández-Cerero José León Samuel P. Analysing the impact of artificial intelligence and computational sciences on student performance: Systematic review and meta-analysis Journal of New Approaches in Educational Research 2023 12 171 97 10.7821/naer.2023.1.1240 · DOI
- Gonsalves Chahna Generative AI’s Impact on Critical Thinking: Revisiting Bloom’s Taxonomy Journal of Marketing Education 2024 1 1 16 10.1177/02734753241305980 · DOI · Paper page
- Guo Kai Zhong Yuchun Li Danling Chu Samuel Kai Wah Effects of chatbot-assisted in-class debates on students’ argumentation skills and task motivation Computers & Education 2023 10 1 19 10.1016/j.compedu.2023.104862 · DOI · Paper page
- Heung Yuk Mui Elly Chiu Thomas K.F. How ChatGPT impacts student engagement from a systematic review and meta-analysis study Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence 2025 8 100361 10.1016/j.caeai.2025.100361 · DOI
- Higgins Julian P. T. Thompson Simon G. Deeks Jonathan J. Altman Douglas G. Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses The BMJ 2003 327 557 60 10.1136/bmj.327.7414.557 12958120 PMC192859 · DOI · Paper page
- Huang Kuo-Liang Liu Yi-Chen Dong Ming-Qing Incorporating AIGC into design ideation: A study on self-efficacy and learning experience acceptance under higher-order thinking Thinking Skills and Creativity 2024a 52 101508 10.1016/j.tsc.2024.101508 · DOI
- Huang Yueh-Min Wang Wei-Sheng Lee Hsin-Yu Lin Chia-Ju Wu Ting-Ting Empowering virtual reality with feedback and reflection in hands-on learning: Effect of learning engagement and higher-order thinking Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 2024b 40 1413 27 10.1111/jcal.12959 · DOI
- Hwang Gwo-Jen Lai Chiu-Lin Liang Jyh-Chong Chu Hui-Chun Tsai Chin-Chung A long-term experiment to investigate the relationships between high school students’ perceptions of mobile learning and peer interaction and higher-order thinking tendencies Educational Technology Research and Development 2018 66 75 93 10.1007/s11423-017-9540-3 · DOI · Paper page
- Hwang Sunghwan Examining the effects of artificial intelligence on elementary students’ mathematics achievement: A meta-Analysis Sustainability 2022 14 13185 10.3390/su142013185 · DOI
- Ilgun Dibek Munevver Kursad Merve Sahin Erdogan Tolga Influence of artificial intelligence tools on higher order thinking skills: A meta-analysis Interactive Learning Environments 2024 33 2216 38 10.1080/10494820.2024.2402028 · DOI · Paper page
- Johinke Rebecca Cummings Robert Di Lauro Frances Reclaiming the technology of higher education for teaching digital writing in a post—Pandemic world Journal of University Teaching & Learning Practice 2023 20 01 10.53761/1.20.02.01 · DOI
- Khan Talha Ahmed Alam Muhammad Rizvi Safdar Ali Shahid Zeeshan Mazliham M. S. Introducing AI applications in engineering education (PBL): An implemen-tation of power generation at minimum wind velocity and turbine faults classification using AI Computer Applications in Engineering Education 2023 32 438 10.1002/cae.22691 · DOI
- Kimberly A. Riegel Project-based learning (PBL): Less project, more problem The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 2023 152 272 10.1121/10.0018820 · DOI
- Kimmel Sara AI Facilitated Critical Thinking in an Undergraduate Project Based Service-Learning Course Journal of Behavioral and Applied Management 2024 24 123 30 10.21818/001c.122149 · DOI
- Lewis Arthur Smith David Defining higher order thinking Theory into Practice 1993 32 131 37 10.1080/00405849309543588 · DOI
- Li Haifeng Wang Wei Human-machine collaborative in-depth inquiry teaching model: The case of ChatGPT and QQ-based collaborative inquiry learning system Open Education Research 2023 29 69 81 10.13966/j.cnki.kfjyyj.2023.06.008 · DOI
- Li Haifeng Wang Wei Human-machine debate inquiry method: A study on using debate-style intelligent dialogue robots to foster students’ higher-order thinking skills E-education Research 2024 45 106 12+128 10.13811/j.cnki.eer.2024.03.015 · DOI
- Li Haifeng Wang Wei Li Guangxin Wang Yuan Smart midwifery teaching method: The practice of “smart Socratic dialogue robot” teaching Open Education Research 2024a 30 89 99 10.13966/j.cnki.kfjyyj.2024.02.010 · DOI
- Li Pin-Hui Lee Hsin-Yu Lin Chia-Ju Wang Wei-Sheng Huang Yueh-Min InquiryGPT: Augmenting ChatGPT for enhancing inquiry-based learning in STEM education Journal of Educational Computing Research 2024b 62 1 30 10.1177/07356331241289824 · DOI
- Li Yan Xu Jie Jia Chengyuan Zhai Xuesong The current status and reflections on the application of generative artificial intelligence among university students: A case study from Zhejiang University Open Education Research 2024c 30 89 98 10.13966/j.cnki.kfjyyj.2024.01.010 · DOI
- Liu Jun Liu Zile Wang Cong Xu Yanhua Chen Jiayu Cheng Yichun K-12 students’ higher-order thinking skills: Conceptualization, components, and evaluation indicators Thinking Skills and Creativity 2024a 52 101551 10.1016/j.tsc.2024.101551 · DOI
- Liu Ming Guo Shuo Wu Zhongming Liao Jian Generative artificial intelligence reshaping the landscape of higher education: Content, cases, and pathways E-educational Research 2024b 45 57 65 10.13811/j.cnki.eer.2024.06.007 · DOI
- Liu Yangxia Connotation and cultivation of mathematical advanced thinking ability Creative Education Studies 2022 10 1294 300 10.12677/CES.2022.106208 · DOI
- Lu Kaili Zhu Jianrong Pang Feng Shadiev Rustam Understanding the relationship between college students’ artificial intelligence literacy and higher-order thinking skills using the 3P model: The mediating roles of behavioral engagement and peer interaction Educational Technology Research and Development 2024 72 10434 10.1007/s11423-024-10434-1 · DOI
- Luo Gongbo Niu Changsong Lu Lu Wu Ling Huang Lin Empirical study on the double-edged effects of generative artificial intelligence on team creativity among university students Education and Information Technologies 2025 30 18853 78 10.1007/s10639-025-13527-3 · DOI
- Maniktala Mehak Chi Min Barnes Tiffany Enhancing a student productivity model for adaptive problemsolving assistance User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction 2023 33 159 88 10.1007/s11257-022-09338-7 35966028 PMC9362072 · DOI
- OECD Fostering Students’ Creativity and Critical Thinking: What it Means in School 2019 Available online: https://read.oecd-ilibrary.org/education/fostering-students-creativity-and-critical-thinking_62212c37-en (accessed on 24 October 2019)
- Pujawan I. G. N. Rediani N. N. Antara I. G. W. S. Putri N. N. C. A. Bayu G. W. Revised Bloom taxonomy-oriented learning activities to develop scientific literacy and creative thinking skills Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia 2022 11 47 60 10.15294/jpii.v11i1.34628 · DOI
- Putra Febri W. Rangka Itsar B. Aminah Siti Aditama Mint. H. R. ChatGPT in the higher education environment: Perspectives from the theory of higher-order thinking skills Journal of Public Health 2023 45 840 41 10.1093/pubmed/fdad120 37455540 · DOI
- Qi Jia Xu Yanru Liu Ji’an Xue Kai The impact of generative AI tools on critical thinking and independent learning ability in university students E-Education Research 2024 45 67 74 10.13811/j.cnki.eer.2024.12.009 · DOI
- Shi Wanruo Han Xibin The impact of generative artificial intelligence on learning analytics research: Current status and future directions—A review of LAK24 E-Educational Research 2024 45 113 20 10.13811/j.cnki.eer.2024.12.015 · DOI
- Sun Dan Zhu Chengcong Xu Zuodong Xu Guangtao Analysis of college students’ programming learning behavior based on generative AI E-Education Research 2024 45 113 20 10.13811/j.cnki.eer.2024.03.016 · DOI
- Tan Shuxin Cho Young Woo Towards a higher order thinking skills—Oriented translation competence model Translation, Cognition & Behavior 2021 4 187 211 10.1075/tcb.00053.tan · DOI
- Van der Willik Esmee M. van Zwet Erik W. Hoekstra Tiny van Ittersum Frans J. Hemmelder Marc H. Zoccali Carmine Jager Kitty J. Dekker Friedo W. Meuleman Yvette Funnel plots of patient-reported outcomes (PROs) to evaluate healthcare quality: Basic principles, pitfalls and considerations Nephrology 2021 26 95 104 10.1111/nep.13761 32725679 PMC7891340 · DOI
- Wang Siyao Huang Yating Facilitation or Inhibition: The Impact of Generative Artificial Intelligence on College Students’ Creativity China Higher Education Research 2024 11 29 36 10.16298/j.cnki.1004-3667.2024.11.05 · DOI
- Wang Yanbei Liu Liping Learning elements for developing higher-order thinking in a blended learning environment: A comprehensive survey of Chinese vocational high school students Education and Information Technologies 2024 29 19443 70 10.1007/s10639-024-12572-8 · DOI
- Wang Yan Lavonen Jari Tirri Kirsi Twenty-first century competencies in the Chinese science curriculum Nordic-Chinese Intersections Within Education. Palgrave Studies on Chinese Education in a Global Perspective Liu Haiqin Dervin Fred Du Xiangyun Palgrave Macmillan London 2019 151 71
- Xu Yeqing Zhu Jingdong Wang Minkai Qian Fang Yang Yiling Zhang Jie The impact of a digital game-based AI chatbot on students’ academic performance, higher-order thinking, and behavioral patterns in an information technology curriculum Applied Sciences 2024 14 6418 10.3390/app14156418 · DOI · Paper page
- Yang Ya-Ting Carolyn Virtual CEOs: A blended approach to digital gaming for enhancing higher-order thinking and academic achievement among vocational high school students Computers & Education 2015 81 281 95 10.1016/j.compedu.2014.10.004 · DOI
- Zawacki-Richter Olaf Marín Victoria I. Bond Melissa Gouverneur Franziska Systematic review of research on artificial intelligence applications in higher education—Where are the educators? International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education 2019 16 1 27 10.1186/s41239-019-0171-0 · DOI · Paper page
- Zhang Wenlan Hu Jiao Has project-based learning taken effect? A meta-analysis based on 46 experimental and quasi-experimental studies Audio-Visual Education Research 2019 2 95 104 10.13811/j.cnki.eer.2019.02.012 · DOI
- Zhao Guoqing Sheng Haixi Wang Yaxuan Cai Xiaohui Long Taotao Generative artificial intelligence amplifies the role of critical thinking skills and reduces reliance on prior knowledge while promoting in-depth learning Education Sciences 2025 15 554 10.3390/educsci15050554 · DOI
- Zheng Lanqin Gao Lei Huang Zichen Can generative AI-powered dialogue robots promote online collaborative learning performance? E-Education Research 2024 45 70 84 70–76+84 10.13811/j.cnki.eer.2024.03.010 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Alamri, J. M., & Alhalafawy, W. S. (2026) · International Journal of Technology in Education · doi:10.46328/ijte.8779
- Authors
- Zhao, Y., Yue, Y., Sun, Z., Jiang, Q., & Li, G.
- Affiliations
- Changchun Normal University (CN)
- Northeast Normal University (CN)
- Ocean University of China (CN)
- Corresponding author
- Sun, Zhonghua
- Li, Gangsheng
- ORCID
- Jiang, Qiang
- Venue
- Journal of Intelligence
- Publisher
- MDPI AG
- Published
- 2025-12-05
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 160
- ISSN
- 2079-3200 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC12734368
- OpenAlex
- W4417045567
- Cited by
- 37
- References
- 18
- Citations by year
- 2026: 37
- FWCI
- 5.69
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Journal of Intelligence (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Funders
- Planning Project for Humanities and Social Sciences of the Ministry of Education (23YJA880023)
- Jilin Province Educational Science Project (GH25412)
- Project of the Jilin Provincial Higher Education Society (JGJX2025C107)
- Social Science Foundation Projects of CCNU (CSJJ2022019SK)
- National Natural Science Foundation of China (62577018)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Artificial Intelligence in Education
- Social Sciences › Education › Education and Critical Thinking Development
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
- Keywords
- generative AI, higher-order thinking skills, problem solving, critical thinking, creativity, student self-regulation, moderators, intervention duration, artificial intelligence in education
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review