The challenges of instructors’ and students’ attitudes in digital transformation: A case study of Saudi Universities
Open accessAbstract
Digital Transformation (DT) has become the core motivator for almost all organizations worldwide. In order to cope up with the new demands, Higher Education Institutions (HEIs) are also giving due consideration to digitizing their services, including pedagogical services. Many challenges are being faced during the successful adoption of DT strategies and plans. One of the main obstacles is the set of challenges related to the stakeholders in HEIs; more precisely, instructors and students. This paper extracts, synthesizes, categorizes, and prioritizes the challenges hindering the success of DT in Saudi universities. Firstly, the paper extracts the main challenges faced by instructors and students, and then constructs a model of the challenges based on the tripartite classification of attitude. The paper adopts a Multi-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) Method, called the Analytic Network Process (ANP), for the purpose of gathering instructors' and students' evaluations and prioritizing their challenges accordingly. A total of 25 instructors and students were recruited from various HEIs in Saudi Arabia to evaluate the model. The results show that learning performance, lack of access to resources, and fear of change are the most significant factors hindering students towards successful adoption of DT. On the other hand, fear of change followed by lack of experience and privacy concerns are the most significant factors hindering instructors towards successful adoption of DT. The research is intended to enlighten decision-makers in Saudi HEIs to consider non-technical challenges while planning for digitizing HEIs services.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
School Engagement: Potential of the Concept, State of the Evidence
Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/00346543074001059 · Cited by 12,581 · see citing works
How to Make a Decision: The Analytic Hierarchy Process
Saaty, T. L. (1990) · European Journal of Operational Research · doi:10.1016/0377-2217(90)90057-i · Cited by 9,605 · see citing works
Bharadwaj, A. S. (2000) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/3250983 · Cited by 5,042 · see citing works
Digital Business Strategy: Toward a Next Generation of Insights
Bharadwaj, A., El Sawy, O. A., Pavlou, P. A., & Venkatraman, N. (2013) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.25300/misq/2013/37:2.3 · Cited by 4,392 · see citing works
Student engagement literature review
Trowler, V. (2010) · Cited by 1,078 · see citing works
Measuring student engagement in technology-mediated learning: A review
Henrie, C. R., Halverson, L. R., & Graham, C. R. (2015) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2015.09.005 · Cited by 1,010 · see citing works
Digital Transformation: A Literature Review and Guidelines for Future Research
dos Reis, J. C. G., Amorim, M. P. C., Melão, N. F., & de Matos, P. A. (2018) · Advances in intelligent systems and computing · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-77703-0_41 · Cited by 817 · see citing works
Rashid, T., & Asghar, H. M. (2016) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2016.05.084 · Cited by 649 · see citing works
Blasco-Arcas, L., Buil, I., Hernández-Ortega, B., & Sese, F. J. (2013) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2012.10.019 · Cited by 568 · see citing works
Information Technology and the Good Life
Stolterman, E., & Fors, A. C. (2004) · IFIP International Federation for Information Processing/IFIP · doi:10.1007/1-4020-8095-6_45 · Cited by 391 · see citing works
Challenges for digital transformation – towards a conceptual decision support guide for managers
Heavin, C., & Power, D. (2018) · Journal of Decision System · doi:10.1080/12460125.2018.1468697 · Cited by 372 · see citing works
Fonseca, D., Audí, N. M., Domínguez, E. R., et al. (2013) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2013.03.006 · Cited by 305 · see citing works
Al-Rahmi, W. M., Alias, N., Othman, M. S., Marin, V. I., & Tur, G. (2018) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2018.02.010 · Cited by 225 · see citing works
Cook, D. R., Staschak, S., & Green, W. T. (1990) · European Journal of Operational Research · doi:10.1016/0377-2217(90)90060-o · Cited by 198 · see citing works
Filkins, B. L., Kim, J. Y., Roberts, B., Armstrong, W., Miller, M. A., Hultner, M. L., Castillo, A., Ducom, J. C., Topol, E. J., & Steinhubl, S. R. (2016) · PubMed Central · Cited by 157 · see citing works
Decision Making in Complex Environments
Noyes, J., & Masakowski, Y. R. (2017) · CRC Press eBooks · doi:10.1201/9781315576138 · Cited by 156 · see citing works
Rasiah, R. (2014) · Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.1435 · Cited by 126 · see citing works
Digital Transformation Readiness in Higher Education Institutions (HEI): The Case of Kosovo
Limani, Y., Hajrizi, E., Stapleton, L., et al. (2019) · IFAC-PapersOnLine · doi:10.1016/j.ifacol.2019.12.445 · Cited by 120 · see citing works
Preparing analytics for a strategic role behind wellpoint
Fitzgerald, M. (2014) · Dialnet (Universidad de la Rioja) · Cited by 74 · see citing works
THE EFFECTS OF SOCIAL MEDIA USE ON COLLABORATIVE LEARNING: A CASE OF TURKEY
Bozanta, A., & Mardikyan, S. (2017) · Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education · doi:10.17718/tojde.285719 · Cited by 68 · see citing works
Taslıcalı, A. K., & Ercan, S. (2006) · Havacılık ve uzay teknolojileri dergisi · Cited by 62 · see citing works
(2010) · Discourse Learning and Teaching in Philosophical and Religious Studies · doi:10.5840/discourse20101012 · Cited by 45 · see citing works
Estimating the Benefits, Drawbacks and Risk of Digital Transformation Strategy
Yucel, S. (2018) · International Conference on Computational Science and Computational Intelligence (CSCI) · doi:10.1109/csci46756.2018.00051 · Cited by 41 · see citing works
The Barriers of using Education Technology for Optimizing the Educational Experience of Learners
Joseph, J. E. (2012) · Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.11.051 · Cited by 37 · see citing works
Pérez‐López, R., Gurrea, R., Herrando, C., Hoyos, M. J. M., Juste, M. V. B., & Acerete, A. U. (2020) · Australasian Journal of Educational Technology · doi:10.14742/ajet.5751 · Cited by 37 · see citing works
Current and future state of Portuguese organizations towards digital transformation
Durão, N., Ferreira, M. J., Pereira, C. S., & Moreira, F. (2019) · Procedia Computer Science · doi:10.1016/j.procs.2019.12.150 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
Using insights from (public) services management to improve student engagement in higher education
Cassidy, K. J., Sullivan, M. N., & Radnor, Z. (2019) · Studies in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/03075079.2019.1665010 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
Technology Selection for Digital Transformation: A Mixed Decision Making Model of AHP and QFD
Erbay, H., & Yıldırım, N. (2018) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-92267-6_41 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
Al-Ohali, Y., AlHojailan, M. I., Palavitsinis, N., et al. (2019) · Advances in intelligent systems and computing · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-20135-7_5 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Fitzgerald M Kruschwitz N Bonnet D Welch M Embracing digital technology: A new strategic imperative MIT Sloan Management Review 2014 55 2 1
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Alotaibi, N. S., & Alshehri, A. H. (2023) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su151310723 · Cited by 181 · see citing works
Oncioiu, I., & Bularca, A. R. (2025) · Societies · doi:10.3390/soc15060144 · Cited by 64 · see citing works
- Authors
- Alhubaishy, A., & Aljuhani, A.
- Affiliations
- Saudi Electronic University (SA)
- Taibah University (SA)
- Corresponding author
- Alhubaishy, Abdulaziz
- Venue
- Education and Information Technologies
- Published
- 2021-03-16
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 4647-4662
- ISSN
- 1360-2357 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-7608
- PMC
- PMC7963467
- OpenAlex
- W3136296434
- Cited by
- 79
- References
- 29
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 1
- FWCI
- 11.29
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Education and Information Technologies (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Educational Innovations and Challenges
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Educational Innovations and Technology
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Technology Adoption and User Behaviour
- Keywords
- digital transformation, higher education, instructor attitudes, student attitudes, barriers to adoption, fear of change, privacy concerns, learning performance, digital pedagogy, Saudi universities, stakeholder challenges
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
