The DOI matches its Crossref record; 116 of the 119 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Impact of online classes on the satisfaction and performance of students during the pandemic period of COVID 19
Open accessAbstract
The aim of the study is to identify the factors affecting students' satisfaction and performance regarding online classes during the pandemic period of COVID-19 and to establish the relationship between these variables. The study is quantitative in nature, and the data were collected from 544 respondents through online survey who were studying the business management (B.B.A or M.B.A) or hotel management courses in Indian universities. Structural equation modeling was used to analyze the proposed hypotheses. The results show that four independent factors used in the study viz. quality of instructor, course design, prompt feedback, and expectation of students positively impact students' satisfaction and further student's satisfaction positively impact students' performance. For educational management, these four factors are essential to have a high level of satisfaction and performance for online courses. This study is being conducted during the epidemic period of COVID- 19 to check the effect of online teaching on students' performance.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“In a study by Gopal et al. [57], it was found that quality of instructor and the ability to use technological tools is an important element in influencing students engagement.”
From Impact of online learning on student's performance and engagement: a systematic review (2024) · cites this paper as [57]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling
Tabri, N., & Elliott, C. M. (2012) · Canadian Graduate Journal of Sociology and Criminology · doi:10.15353/cgjsc.v1i1.3787 · Cited by 39,094
(1998) · Cited by 36,049
Consumer Perceptions of Price, Quality, and Value: A Means-End Model and Synthesis of Evidence
Zeithaml, V. A. (1988) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1177/002224298805200302 · Cited by 18,292
A Cognitive Model of the Antecedents and Consequences of Satisfaction Decisions
Oliver, R. L. (1980) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1177/002224378001700405 · Cited by 14,494
Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/003465430298487 · Cited by 12,905 · cited 1×
“Within this context, feedback is a “consequence of performance” (Hattie & Timperley, 2007, p. 81).”
BackgroundA social-cognitive approach to motivation and personality.
Dweck, C. S., & Leggett, E. L. (1988) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.95.2.256 · Cited by 9,745
A Beginner's Guide to Structural Equation Modeling: Fourth Edition
Schumacker, R. E., & Lomax, R. G. (2015) · doi:10.4324/9781315749105 · Cited by 6,604
Classrooms: Goals, structures, and student motivation.
Ames, C. (1992) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-0663.84.3.261 · Cited by 6,468
A Beginner's Guide to Structural Equation Modeling
Schumacker, R. E., & Lomax, R. G. (2004) · doi:10.4324/9781410610904 · Cited by 6,235
(2005) · Cited by 6,097
Research works printed but not linked: 6
- Almaiah, M. A., & Almulhem, A. (2018). A conceptual framework for determining the success factors of e-learning system implementation using Delphi technique. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Information Technology, 96(17), 5962–5976.
- Fredericksen, E., Shea, P., & Pickett, A. (2000). Factors influencing student and faculty satisfaction in the SUNY learning network. State University of New York.
- Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E., & Tatham, R. L. (2006). Multivariate data analysis 6th edition. Pearson Prentice Hall. New Jersey. Humans: Critique and reformulation. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 87, 49–74.
- Rogers, J. (1992). Adults learning (3rd ed.). Open University Press.
- Wooldridge, B. (1995). Increasing the effectiveness of university/college instruction: Integrating the results of learning style research into course design and delivery. In R. R. Simms and S. J. Simms (Eds.), the Importance of Learning Styles. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 49–67.
- Wright, C. R. (2003). Criteria for evaluating the quality of online courses. Alberta distance Educ. Training Assoc., 16(2), 185–200.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Balancing Technology, Pedagogy and the New Normal: Post-pandemic Challenges for Higher Education
Rapanta, C., Botturi, L., Goodyear, P., Ortiz, L. G., & Koole, M. L. (2021) · Postdigital Science and Education · doi:10.1007/s42438-021-00249-1 · Cited by 727
Paradigma Kurikulum Merdeka Bagi Guru Sekolah Dasar
Fitriyah, C. Z., & Wardani, R. P. (2022) · Scholaria Jurnal Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan · doi:10.24246/j.js.2022.v12.i3.p236-243 · Cited by 200
Impact of online learning on student's performance and engagement: a systematic review
Akpen, C. N., Asaolu, S., Atobatele, S., Okagbue, H., & Sampson, S. (2024) · Discover Education · doi:10.1007/s44217-024-00253-0 · Cited by 205
“In a study by Gopal et al. [57], it was found that quality of instructor and the ability to use technological tools is an important element in influencing students engagement.”
She, L., Ma, L., Jan, A., Sharif Nia, H., & Rahmatpour, P. (2021) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.743936 · Cited by 170
Dahri, N. A., Yahaya, N., Al-Rahmi, W. M., Vighio, M. S., Alblehai, F., Soomro, R. B., & Shutaleva, A. V. (2024) · Education and Information Technologies · doi:10.1007/s10639-024-12599-x · Cited by 205
Metadata
- Authors
- Gopal, R., Singh, V., & Aggarwal, A.
- Affiliations
- Chitkara University (IN)
- Corresponding author
- Gopal, Ram
- Singh, Varsha
- Aggarwal, Arun
- Venue
- Education and Information Technologies
- Published
- 2021-04-21
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 6923-6947
- ISSN
- 1360-2357 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-7608
- PMC
- PMC8059127
- OpenAlex
- W3154556092
- Cited by
- 618
- References
- 119
- Citations by year
- 2026: 32 · 2025: 75 · 2024: 121 · 2023: 178 · 2022: 161 · 2021: 51
- FWCI
- 224.43
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Education and Information Technologies (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Education during COVID-19 pandemic
- Social Sciences › Education › Online and Blended Learning
- Social Sciences › Education › Online Learning Methods and Innovations
- Keywords
- online courses, student satisfaction, student performance, COVID-19 pandemic, online learning, instructor quality, course design, immediate feedback, student expectations, business management education, hotel management education, higher education
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review