Cited by 23Education and Technology IntegrationEFL/ESL Teaching and LearningEnglish Language Learning and Teaching

Learning with the interactive whiteboard in the classroom: its impact on vocabulary acquisition, motivation and the role of foreign language anxiety

Open access
Kühl, Tim, Wohninsland, Patrizia·2022·Education and Information Technologies

Abstract

When used in a sensible way, Interactive Whiteboards (IWB) are supposed to motivate and engage students in learning in the classroom. Thereby, they might also stimulate students who are usually more restrained, such as more anxious students. However, the body of research on the impact of IWB lessons is rather small. The present study investigated whether a 45-minute lesson with the IWB compared to a conceptual identical 45-minute lesson without the IWB would support learning and motivation within the subject English as a foreign language for German students. Moreover, the study examined whether the 45-minute lesson with the IWB compared to the 45-minute lesson without the IWB would be better able to counteract the detrimental effects of foreign language classroom anxiety (FLCA). One hundred and two eighth graders from two secondary schools in Germany took part in this study and were either taught with the IWB (condition IWB; n = 53) or without the IWB (condition No-IWB; n = 50). Results showed that students in the IWB condition stated to be higher motivated and performed better in a vocabulary test than their counterparts in the No-IWB condition. FLCA was negatively correlated with performance in the vocabulary test. Other than expected, learning with the IWB did not compensate the detrimental effect of FLCA, meaning that learning with the IWB was more beneficial than learning without the IWB irrespective of a student’s FLCA. Implications of the study will be discussed.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10639-022-11004-9

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. Er, S. (2015). Foreign language learning anxiety of Turkish children at different ages. International Online Journal of Education and Teaching, 2, 68-78. http://iojet.org/index.php/IOJET/article/view/81/106
  2. Hattie, J. (2008). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. Routledge
  3. Hayes, A. F. (2017). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regres- sion-based approach (2nd edition). New York: Guilford Press
  4. Lin, C. C., Hsiao, H. S., Tseng, S. P., & Chan, H. J. (2014). Learning English vocabulary collaboratively in a technology-supported classroom. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 13, 162-173
  5. v8n3p193 · DOI
  6. tb00677.x · DOI · Paper page
  7. ch009 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kühl, T., & Wohninsland, P.
Affiliations
  • University of Potsdam (DE)
  • Lithuanian Maritime Academy (LT)
Corresponding author
Kühl, Tim
Venue
Education and Information Technologies
Published
2022-04-18
Volume
27
Issue
7
Pages
10387-10404
ISSN
  • 1360-2357 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-7608
OpenAlex
W4223902837
Cited by
23
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 2
FWCI
9.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Education and Information Technologies (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • MADOC (University of Mannheim) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • publish.UP (University of Potsdam) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
Universität Mannheim
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Education and Technology Integration
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › English Language Learning and Teaching
Keywords
interactive whiteboards, vocabulary acquisition, foreign language classroom anxiety, student motivation, English as a foreign language, technology-enhanced language learning

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review