CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 178Online Learning and AnalyticsExplainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)AI and HR Technologies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 73 of the 77 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Explainable AI and machine learning: performance evaluation and explainability of classifiers on educational data mining inspired career counseling

Open access
Guleria, Pratiyush, Sood, Manu·2023·Education and Information Technologies
DOI 10.1007/s10639-022-11221-2PMC PMC9287825
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

Machine Learning concept learns from experiences, inferences and conceives complex queries. Machine learning techniques can be used to develop the educational framework which understands the inputs from students, parents and with intelligence generates the result. The framework integrates the features of Machine Learning (ML), Explainable AI (XAI) to analyze the educational factors which are helpful to students in achieving career placements and help students to opt for the right decision for their career growth. It is supposed to work like an expert system with decision support to figure out the problems, the way humans solve the problems by understanding, analyzing, and remembering. In this paper, the authors have proposed a framework for career counseling of students using ML and AI techniques. ML-based White and Black Box models analyze the educational dataset comprising of academic and employability attributes that are important for the job placements and skilling of the students. In the proposed framework, White Box and Black Box models get trained over an educational dataset taken in the study. The Recall and F-Measure score achieved by the Naive Bayes for performing predictions is 91.2% and 90.7% that is best compared to the score of Logistic Regression, Decision Tree, SVM, KNN, and Ensemble models taken in the study.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10639-022-11221-2

Cites

73 of 73 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 11

  1. Alexitch, L. R., & Page, S. (1997). Evaluation of academic and career counseling information and its relation to students’ educational orientation. Canadian Journal of Counseling, 31(3), 205–218.
  2. Doshi-Velez, F., & Kim, B. (2017). Towards a rigorous science of interpretable machine learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:1702.08608. · arXiv
  3. Gorad, N., Zalte, I., Nandi, A., & Nayak, D. (2017). Career counseling using data mining. International Journal of Innovative Research in Computer and Communication Engineering.
  4. Guidotti, R., Monreale, A., Ruggieri, S., Pedreschi, D., Turini, F., & Giannotti, F. (2018). Local rule-based explanations of black box decision systems. arXiv preprint arXiv:1805.10820. · arXiv
  5. Hall, P., & Gill, N. (2019). An introduction to machine learning interpretability. O’Reilly Media, Incorporated.
  6. Mao, J., Gan, C., Kohli, P., Tenenbaum, J. B., & Wu, J. (2019). The neuro-symbolic concept learner: Interpreting scenes, words, and sentences from natural supervision. arXiv preprint arXiv:1904.12584. · arXiv
  7. Morgan, T., & Ness, D. (2003). Career decision-making difficulties of first-year students. The Canadian Journal of Career Development, 2(1), 33–39.
  8. Pujari, A. M., Dalvi, R. M., Gawde, K. S., & Tatwadarshi, P. N. (2019). SCCAI-A Student Career Counseling Artificial Intelligence. VIVA-Tech International Journal for Research and Innovation, 1(2), 1–6.
  9. Sample, I. (2017). Computer says no: Why making AIs fair, accountable and transparent is crucial. The Guardian, 5, 1–15.
  10. Valenzuela-Escárcega, M. A., Nagesh, A., & Surdeanu, M. (2018). Lightly-supervised representation learning with global interpretability. arXiv preprint arXiv:1805.11545. · arXiv
  11. Watkins, K. A. N. O. K. W. A. N. An improved recommendation models on grade point average prediction and postgraduate identification using data mining. Advances in Neural Networks, Fuzzy Systems and Artificial Intelligence, 186–194.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 178

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Guleria, P., & Sood, M.
Affiliations
Himachal Pradesh University (IN)
Corresponding author
Guleria, Pratiyush
ORCID
Venue
Education and Information Technologies
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2022-07-16
Volume
28
Issue
1
Pages
1081-1116
ISSN
  • 1360-2357 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-7608
DOI
10.1007/s10639-022-11221-2
PMC
PMC9287825
OpenAlex
W4285586905
Cited by
178
References
77
Citations by year
2026: 43 · 2025: 63 · 2024: 54 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 1
FWCI
26.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • Education and Information Technologies (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Science Applications › Online Learning and Analytics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › AI and HR Technologies
Keywords
explainable AI, career guidance, educational data mining, classifier evaluation, decision support system, naive Bayes

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review