The DOI matches its Crossref record; 49 of the 49 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Ethical artificial intelligence for teaching-learning in higher education
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Recent studies show that students who learn in an environment where ethical values are lived-not just stated-are more receptive to topics related to algorithmic responsibility and show a greater willingness to engage in reflections on the regulation of AI [43,48-50].”
Citations
Cites
Zawacki-Richter, O., Marín, V. I., Bond, M., & Gouverneur, F. (2019) · International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education · doi:10.1186/s41239-019-0171-0 · Cited by 7,242
The global landscape of AI ethics guidelines
Jobin, A., Ienca, M., & Vayena, E. (2019) · Nature Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1038/s42256-019-0088-2 · Cited by 6,220
Expansive Learning at Work: Toward an activity theoretical reconceptualization
Engeström, Y. (2001) · Journal of Education and Work · doi:10.1080/13639080020028747 · Cited by 5,436
Floridi, L., Cowls, J., Beltrametti, M., Chatila, R., Chazerand, P., Dignum, V., Luetge, C., Madelin, R., Pagallo, U., Rossi, F., et al. (2018) · Minds and Machines · doi:10.1007/s11023-018-9482-5 · Cited by 4,774 · cited 3×
“Considering these similarities, AI4People (Floridi et al., 2018 ), an Atomium-European Institute for Science, Media and Democracy (EISMD) initiative designed to lay the foundations for a “Good AI Society”, offers a synthesis of existing sets of principles produced by various reputable, multi-stakeholder organizations…”
InfluentialKnowledge, Knowledge Work and Organizations: An Overview and Interpretation
Blackler, F. (1995) · Organization Studies · doi:10.1177/017084069501600605 · Cited by 2,498
Artificial intelligence in higher education: the state of the field
Crompton, H., & Burke, D. (2023) · International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education · doi:10.1186/s41239-023-00392-8 · Cited by 2,010 · cited 3×
“This study will build upon the findings of Zawacki et al. ( 2019 ), Hinojo-Lucena et al. ( 2019 ), Ouyang et al. ( 2022 ), and Crompton and Burke ( 2023 ) concerning the use of AIED in higher education.”
Activity Theory as a Potential Framework for Human-Computer Interaction Research
Kuurti, K. (1995) · The MIT Press eBooks · doi:10.7551/mitpress/2137.003.0006 · Cited by 1,717
Artificial intelligence in education : challenges and opportunities for sustainable development
Pedró, F., Subosa, M., Rivas, A., & Valverde, P. (2019) · MINISTERIO DE EDUCACIÓN · Cited by 902
Morley, J., Floridi, L., Kinsey, L., & Elhalal, A. (2020) · Science and Engineering Ethics · doi:10.1007/s11948-019-00165-5 · Cited by 882 · cited 2×
“Third, difficulty to ensure that the same meaning is intended between these set of principles, despite their slightly different terminology (Morley et al., 2020 ).”
Ouyang, F., Zheng, L., & Jiao, P. (2022) · Education and Information Technologies · doi:10.1007/s10639-022-10925-9 · Cited by 831
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- Bates, T., Cobo, C., Mariño, O., & Wheeler, S. (2020). Can artificial intelligence transform higher education? International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 17, 42. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-020-00218-x. · DOI
- Blackler, F., Crump, N., & McDonald, S. (2000). Organising processes in complex activity networks. Organisation, 7(2), 277–300.
- Nicolini, D. (2012). Practice theory, work & organization. Oxford University Press.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Oncioiu, I., & Bularca, A. R. (2025) · Societies · doi:10.3390/soc15060144 · Cited by 64
Blahopoulou, J., & Ortiz-Bonnin, S. (2025) · Education and Information Technologies · doi:10.1007/s10639-025-13575-9 · Cited by 50
“Thus, contrary to expectations, AI may help enhance human teaching rather than replacing it (Airaj, 2024).”
Study on the Impact of Artificial Intelligence on Student Learning Outcomes
Sasikala, P., & Ravichandran, R. (2024) · Journal of Digital Learning and Education · doi:10.52562/jdle.v4i2.1234 · Cited by 76
Lin, M. P.-C., Liu, A. L., Poitras, E., Chang, M., & Chang, D. (2024) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su16208992 · Cited by 72
AI in higher education: A bibliometric analysis, synthesis, and a critique of research
Lachheb, A., Leung, J., Abramenka‐Lachheb, V., & Sankaranarayanan, R. (2025) · The Internet and Higher Education · doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2025.101021 · Cited by 64
Metadata
- Authors
- Airaj, M.
- Affiliations
- Sidi Mohamed Ben Abdellah University (MA)
- Corresponding author
- Airaj, Mohammed
- ORCID
- Airaj, Mohammed
- Venue
- Education and Information Technologies
- Published
- 2024-02-21
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 13
- Pages
- 17145-17167
- ISSN
- 1360-2357 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-7608
- OpenAlex
- W4392016362
- Cited by
- 115
- References
- 48
- Citations by year
- 2026: 55 · 2025: 50 · 2024: 10
- FWCI
- 43.24
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- Education and Information Technologies (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Artificial Intelligence in Education
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
- Keywords
- ethical artificial intelligence, artificial intelligence in education, human-centered AI, AI teachers, data privacy, educational technology ethics, equitable access to knowledge, personalized learning, critical thinking
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
