Cited by 834Artificial Intelligence in EducationOnline Learning and AnalyticsIntelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning

Artificial intelligence in online higher education: A systematic review of empirical research from 2011 to 2020

Ouyang, Fan, Zheng, Luyi, Jiao, Pengcheng·2022·Education and Information Technologies

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10639-022-10925-9

Cites

86 of 86 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The four main functions of AI applications in online higher education are performance prediction, resource recommendation, automatic assessment, and improvement of learning experiences.

    “The findings show that performance prediction, resource recommendation, automatic assessment, and improvement of learning experiences are the four main functions of AI applications in online higher education.”

    From Artificial intelligence in higher education: the state of the field (2023) · cites this paper as Ouyang et. al. (2022)

  • Extant systematic reviews on higher education highlighted the use of AIEd for prediction.

    “Extant systematic reviews on HE highlighted the use of AIEd for prediction (viz., Chu etal., 2022; Hinojo-Lucena etal., 2019; Ouyang etal., 2022; Zawacki-Richter etal., 2019).”

    From Artificial intelligence in higher education: the state of the field (2023) · cites this paper as Ouyang et al., 2022

  • Based on emotional signals, AI can adapt the learning environment, such as by using motivational messages or simplifying the task at moments of frustration of the learner, or gamifying when the learner is bored.

    “Based on such emotional signals, AI can adapt the learning environment, such as by using motivational messages or simplifying the task at moments of frustration of the learner, or gamifying when the learner is bored [216].”
  • Higher education settings play a significant role in developing learners' socio-affective skills, which are crucial for their overall well-being.

    “higher education settings are not only about promoting cognitive skills and knowledge but also play a significant role in developing learners' socio-affective skills, which are crucial for their overall well-being ([35,37]).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 87 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ouyang, F., Zheng, L., & Jiao, P.
Affiliations
Zhejiang University (CN)
Corresponding author
Ouyang, Fan
Venue
Education and Information Technologies
Published
2022-02-26
Volume
27
Issue
6
Pages
7893-7925
ISSN
  • 1360-2357 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-7608
OpenAlex
W4214643205
Cited by
831
References
87
Citations by year
2026: 198 · 2025: 263 · 2024: 251 · 2023: 112 · 2022: 7
FWCI
19.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Education and Information Technologies (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Natural Science Foundation of China (62177041)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Artificial Intelligence in Education
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Science Applications › Online Learning and Analytics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning
Keywords
artificial intelligence in education, online higher education, online learning, learning analytics, learning outcome prediction, student satisfaction prediction, resource recommendation, automated assessment, deep learning, genetic algorithm, student engagement, academic performance

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review