The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Experienced Utility as a Standard of Policy Evaluation
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979) · Econometrica · doi:10.2307/1914185 · Cited by 48,524
Self-citationLoss aversion in riskless choice: A reference-dependent model.
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1991) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.2307/2937956 · Cited by 6,432
Self-citationStatus quo bias in decision making
Samuelson, W., & Zeckhauser, R. (1988) · Journal of Risk and Uncertainty · doi:10.1007/bf00055564 · Cited by 5,897
Does Economic Growth Improve the Human Lot? Some Empirical Evidence
EASTERLIN, R. A. (1974) · Nations and Households in Economic Growth · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-205050-3.50008-7 · Cited by 4,474
A Survey Method for Characterizing Daily Life Experience: The Day Reconstruction Method
Kahneman, D., Krueger, A. B., Schkade, D. A., Schwarz, N., & Stone, A. A. (2004) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1103572 · Cited by 3,422
Self-citationExperimental Tests of the Endowment Effect and the Coase Theorem
Kahneman, D., Knetsch, J. L., & Thaler, R. H. (1990) · Journal of Political Economy · doi:10.1086/261737 · Cited by 3,194 · cited 2×
“Kahneman et al. (1990) and Bateman et al. (1997) report experimental observations of loss aversion in decisions about private goods.”
BackgroundSelf-citation(2000) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511803475 · Cited by 2,987
Happiness Is a Stochastic Phenomenon
Lykken, D., & Tellegen, A. (1996) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.1996.tb00355.x · Cited by 1,719
Does Market Experience Eliminate Market Anomalies?
List, J. A. (2003) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.1162/00335530360535144 · Cited by 1,183
Cited by
Oswald, A. J., Proto, E., & Sgroi, D. (2015) · Journal of Labor Economics · doi:10.1086/681096 · Cited by 1,008
Money and mental wellbeing: A longitudinal study of medium-sized lottery wins
Gardner, J., & Oswald, A. J. (2007) · Journal of Health Economics · doi:10.1016/j.jhealeco.2006.08.004 · Cited by 562
Valuing Air Quality Using the Life Satisfaction Approach
Luechinger, S. (2009) · The Economic Journal · doi:10.1111/j.1468-0297.2008.02241.x · Cited by 505
The aggregation of environmental benefit values: Welfare measures, distance decay and total WTP
Bateman, I. J., Day, B. H., Georgiou, S., & Lake, I. (2006) · Ecological Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2006.04.003 · Cited by 472
Environmental degradation and happiness
Ferrer-i-Carbonell, A., & Gowdy, J. M. (2007) · Ecological Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2005.12.005 · Cited by 437
Metadata
- Authors
- Kahneman, D., & Sugden, R.
- Venue
- Environmental and Resource Economics
- Published
- 2005-09
- Volume
- 32
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 161-181
- ISSN
- 0924-6460 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-1502
- OpenAlex
- W2072724720
- Cited by
- 597
- References
- 9
- FWCI
- 63.01
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Experienced Utility as a Standard of Policy Evaluation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/s10640-005-6032-4
- The paper
- Kahneman, D., & Sugden, R. (2005). Experienced Utility as a Standard of Policy Evaluation. Environmental and Resource Economics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-005-6032-4
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
