Cited by 16Environmental Toxicology and EcotoxicologyPesticide and Herbicide Environmental StudiesInsect and Pesticide Research

The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.

Assessing the toxicity of thiamethoxam, in natural LUFA 2.2 soil, through three generations of Folsomia candida

Open access
de Lima e Silva, Cláudia, Mariette, Justine, Verweij, Rudo A., van Gestel, Cornelis A. M.·2018·Ecotoxicology

Abstract

In the field, long-term exposure is a rule rather than an exception. As a consequence, the relatively short-term standard toxicity tests may not be adequate for assessing long-term effects of pesticide exposure. This study determined the toxicity of the neonicotinoid thiamethoxam, both pure and in the formulation Actara® (25% active substance), to the springtail Folsomia candida , over three generations (P, F1 and F2). For the parental generation (P), the toxicity of pure thiamethoxam and Actara® did not differ significantly, with LC 50 s and EC 50 s of 0.32–0.35 and 0.23–0.25 mg a.s./kg dry soil, respectively. For the F1 and F2 generations, LC 50 s were >0.37 mg a.s./kg dry soil for both compounds. Actara was more toxic towards reproduction in the F1 generation (EC 50 0.16 mg a.s./kg dry soil) than pure thiamethoxam (EC 50 0.23 mg a.s./kg dry soil). For generation F2, there was no significant difference in the toxicity of the compounds towards reproduction, with EC 50 s of >0.37 and 0.30 mg a.s./kg dry soil for Actara® and pure thiamethoxam respectively. These results suggest a slight decrease in the toxicity of the compounds throughout the generations tested. The similarity in the toxicity of pure and formulated thiamethoxam indicates that the ingredients in the formulation Actara® do not enhance toxicity.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10646-018-1922-8

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 29 · Cited by 16

Research works printed but not linked: 30

  1. Alves PRL, Cardoso EJBN, Martines AM, Sousa JP, Pasini A (2014) Seed dressing pesticides on springtails in two ecotoxicological laboratory tests. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 105:65–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2014.04.010 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Bonmatin J-M, Giorio C, Girolami V, Goulson D, Kreutzweiser DP, Krupke C, Liess M, Long E, Marzaro M, Mitchell EAD, Noome DA, Simon-Delso N, Tapparo A (2015) Environmental fate and exposure; neonicotinoids and fipronil. Environ Sci Pollut Res 22:35–67. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-014-3332-7 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Campiche S, L’Ambert G, Tarradellas J, Becker-van Slooten K (2007) Multigeneration effects of insect growth regulators on the springtail Folsomia candida. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 67:180–189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2006.11.009 · DOI · Paper page
  4. De Lima e Silva C, Brennan N, Brouwer JM, Commandeur D, Verweij RA, Van Gestel CAM (2017) Comparative toxicity of imidacloprid and thiacloprid to different species of soil invertebrates. Ecotoxicology 26:555–564. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10646-017-1790-7 · DOI
  5. Cox L, Koskinen WC, Yen PY (1997) Sorption-desorption of imidacloprid and its metabolites in soils. J Agric Food Chem 45:1468–1472 · DOI
  6. Crouau Y, Cazes L (2003) What causes variability in the Folsomia candida reproduction test? Appl Soil Ecol 22:175–180 · DOI
  7. Dittbrenner N, Moser I, Triebskorn R, Capowiez Y (2011) Assessment of short and long-term effects of imidacloprid on the burrowing behaviour of two earthworm species (Aporrectodea caliginosa and Lumbricus terrestris) by using 2D and 3D post-exposure techniques. Chemosphere 84:1349–1355 · DOI
  8. Dittbrenner N, Capowiez Y, Köhler H, Triebskorn R (2012) Stress protein response (Hsp70) and avoidance behaviour in Eisenia fetida, Aporrectodea caliginosa and Lumbricus terrestris when exposed to imidacloprid. J Soils Sediment 12:198–206. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11368-011-0437-1 · DOI
  9. Ernst G, Kabouw P, Barth M, Marx MT, Frommholz U, Royer S, Friedrich S (2016) Assessing the potential for intrinsic recovery in a Collembola two-generation study: possible implementation in a tiered soil risk assessment approach for plant protection products. Ecotoxicology 25:1–14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10646-015-1560-3 · DOI
  10. Fountain MT, Hopkin SP (2005) Folsomia candida (Collembola): a “standard” soil arthropod. Annu Rev Entomol 50:201–220 · DOI
  11. Goulson D (2013) An overview of the environmental risks posed by neonicotinoid insecticides. J Appl Ecol 50:977–987 · DOI
  12. Idinger J (2002) Laboratory studies to detect effects of selected plant protection products on Folsomia candida (Collembola: lsotomidae). J Plant Dis Prot 109:512–529
  13. ISO (1999) ISO guideline 11267: International Standard: Soil quality-Inhibition of reproduction of Collembola (Folsomia candida) by soil pollutants. International Organization for Standardization, Geneve
  14. Jeschke P, Nauen R (2008) Review: Neonicotinoids–from zero to hero in insecticide chemistry. Pest Manag Sci 64:1084–1098 · DOI
  15. Jeschke P, Nauen R, Schindler M, Elbert A (2011) Overview of the status and global strategy for neonicotinoids. J Agric Food Chem 59:2897–2908. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf101303g · DOI · Paper page
  16. Kagabu S, Murata N, Hibino R, Hanzawa M, Nishimura K (2005) Insecticidal and neuroblocking activities of thiamethoxam-type compounds in the American cockroach (Periplaneta americana L.). J Pestic Sci 30:111–115 · DOI
  17. Leon Paumen M, Steenbergen E, Kraak MHS, Van Straalen NM, Van Gestel CAM (2008) Multigeneration exposure of the springtail Folsomia candida to phenanthrene: from dose-response relationships to threshold concentrations. Environ Sci Technol 42:6985–6990. https://doi.org/10.1021/es8007744 · DOI
  18. Nauen R, Ebbinghaus-Kintscher U, Salgado VL, Kaussmann M (2003) Thiamethoxam is a neonicotinoid precursor converted to clothianidin in insects and plants. Pestic Biochem Physiol 76:55–69 · DOI
  19. OECD (2009) Guidelines for the testing of chemicals No. 232. Collembolan reproduction test in soil. Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development, Paris
  20. Pisa LW, Amaral-Rogers V, Belzunces LP, Bonmatin JM, Downs CA, Goulson D, Kreutzweiser DP, Krupke C, Liess M, McField M, Morrissey CA, Noome DA, Settele J, Simon-Delso N, Stark JD, Van der Sluijs JP, Van Dyck H, Wiemers M (2015) Effects of neonicotinoids and fipronil on non-target invertebrates. Environ Sci Pollut Res 22:68–102. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-014-3471-x · DOI
  21. Pisa L, Goulson D, Yang EC, Gibbons D, Sánchez-Bayo F, Mitchell E, Aebi A, van der Sluijs J, MacQuarrie CJK, Giorio C, Long EY, McField M, van Lexmond MB, Bonmatin JM. (2017) An update of the Worldwide Integrated Assessment (WIA) on systemic insecticides. Part 2: impacts on organisms and ecosystems. Environ Sci Pollut Res. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-017-0341-3 · DOI
  22. Reynolds WN (2008) Imidacloprid insecticide treatments for Hemlock Woolly Adelgid, Adelges tsugae Annand (Hemiptera: Adelgidae), affect a non-target soil arthropod community surrounding Eastern Hemlock, Tsuga canadensis (L.) Carriere. Master’s Thesis, University of Tennessee
  23. Ritz C, Streibig JC (2005) Bioassay analysis using R. J Stat Softw 12:1–22 · DOI
  24. Simon-Delso N, Amaral-Rogers V, Belzunces LP, Bonmatin JM, Chagnon M, Downs C, Furlan L, Gibbons DW, Giorio C, Girolami V, Goulson D, Kreutzweiser DP, Krupke CH, Liess M, Long E, McField M, Mineau P, Mitchell EAD, Morrissey CA, Noome DA, Pisa L, Settele J, Stark JD, Tapparo A, Van Dyck H, Van Praagh J, Van der Sluijs JP, Whitehorn PR, Wiemers M (2015) Systemic insecticides (neonicotinoids and fipronil): trends, uses, mode of action and metabolites. Environ Sci Pollut Res 22:5–34. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-014-3470-y · DOI
  25. Tennekes HA, Sánchez-Bayo F (2013) The molecular basis of simple relationships between exposure concentration and toxic effects with time. Toxicology 309:39–51 · DOI
  26. Thany SH (2011) Thiamethoxam, a poor agonist of nicotinic acetylcholine receptors expressed on isolated cell bodies, acts as a full agonist at cockroach cercal afferent/giant interneuron synapses. Neuropharmacology 60:587–592 · DOI
  27. Van der Sluijs JP, Amaral-Rogers V, Belzunces LP, Bijleveld van Lexmond MFIJ, Bonmatin J, Chagnon M, Downs CA, Furlan L, Gibbons DW, Giorio C, Girolami V, Goulson D, Kreutzweiser DP, Krupke C, Liess M, Long E, McField M, Mineau P, EAD Mitchell, Morrissey CA, Noome DA, Pisa L, Settele J, Simon-Delso N, Stark JD, Tapparo A, Van Dyck H, Van Praagh J, Whitehorn PR, Wiemers M (2015) Conclusions of the worldwide integrated assessment on the risks of neonicotinoids and fipronil to biodiversity and ecosystem functioning. Environ Sci Pollut Res 22:148–154. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-014-3229-5 · DOI
  28. Van Gestel CAM, De Lima e Silva C, Lam T, Koekkoek JC, Lamoree MH, Verweij RA (2017) Multigeneration toxicity of imidacloprid and thiacloprid to Folsomia candida. Ecotoxicology 26:320–328. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10646-017-1765-8 · DOI
  29. Wellmann H, Gomes M, Lee C, Kayser H (2004) Comparative analysis of neonicotinoid binding to insect membranes: II. An unusual high affinity site for [3H] thiamethoxam in Myzus persicae and Aphis craccivora. Pest Manag Sci 60:959–970 · DOI
  30. Wiesner P, Kayser H (2000) Characterization of nicotinic acetylcholine receptors from the insects Aphis craccivora, Myzus persicae, and Locusta migratoria by radioligand binding assays: relation to thiamethoxam action. J Biochem Mol Toxicol 14:221–230 · DOI

Metadata

Authors
de Lima e Silva, C., Mariette, J., Verweij, R. A., & van Gestel, C. A. M.
Affiliations
Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (NL)
Corresponding author
van Gestel, Cornelis A. M.
Venue
Ecotoxicology
Published
2018-04-03
Volume
27
Issue
7
Pages
764-771
ISSN
  • 0963-9292 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-3017
OpenAlex
W2796404271
Cited by
16
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 3
FWCI
0.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Ecotoxicology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • VU Research Portal (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
CNPq (203503/2014-7)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Environmental Toxicology and Ecotoxicology
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Pollution › Pesticide and Herbicide Environmental Studies
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Insect Science › Insect and Pesticide Research
Keywords
thiamethoxam, neonicotinoids, Folsomia candida, Collembola, soil toxicity, reproduction, LC50, EC50, pesticide formulations
MeSH terms
Thiamethoxam, Animals, Arthropods, Insecticides, Lethal Dose 50, Reproduction, Soil Pollutants, Toxicity Tests, Chronic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review