The DOI matches its Crossref record; 94 of the 94 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Systematic Review of Research on Personalized Learning: Personalized by Whom, to What, How, and for What Purpose(s)?
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The "what" and "why" of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000) · Psychological Inquiry · doi:10.1207/s15327965pli1104_01 · Cited by 34,210
Liberati, A., Altman, D. G., Tetzlaff, J., Mulrow, C., Gøtzsche, P. C., Ioannidis, J. P. A., Clarke, M., Devereaux, P. J., Kleijnen, J., & Moher, D. (2009) · PLoS Medicine · doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1000100 · Cited by 28,164
(1985) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 19,180
Liberati, A., Altman, D. G., Tetzlaff, J., Mulrow, C., Gøtzsche, P. C., Ioannidis, J. P. A., Clarke, M., Devereaux, P. J., Kleijnen, J., & Moher, D. (2009) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-151-4-200908180-00136 · Cited by 10,349
(2000) · Cited by 9,198
Review of research in education
Shulman, L. S., Mowry, S., & Berliner, D. C. (1973) · F.E. Peacock eBooks · Cited by 7,754
Funds of knowledge for teaching: Using a qualitative approach to connect homes and classrooms
Moll, L. C., Amanti, C., Neff, D., & Gonzalez, N. (1992) · Theory Into Practice · doi:10.1080/00405849209543534 · Cited by 7,339
Anderson, J. R. (2013) · doi:10.4324/9781315799438 · Cited by 6,761
Sweller, J., Ayres, P., & Kalyuga, S. (2011) · doi:10.1007/978-1-4419-8126-4 · Cited by 5,531
The four-phase model of interest development
Hidi, S., & Renninger, K. A. (2006) · Educational Psychologist · doi:10.1207/s15326985ep4102_4 · Cited by 4,702
Cited by
Halkiopoulos, C., & Gkintoni, E. (2024) · Electronics · doi:10.3390/electronics13183762 · Cited by 328
“It does, indeed, open new perspectives on the stimulation of learners and on enhancing their motivation to learn, hence optimizing learning [41–43].”
Assessing AI adoption in developing country academia: A trust and privacy-augmented UTAUT framework
Rana, M. M., Siddiqee, M. S., Sakib, M. N., & Ahamed, M. R. (2024) · Heliyon · doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e37569 · Cited by 143
A systematic literature review on personalised learning in the higher education context
Fariani, R. I., Junus, K., & Santoso, H. B. (2023) · Technology, Knowledge and Learning · doi:10.1007/s10758-022-09628-4 · Cited by 141
Mekheimer, M. (2025) · Discover Education · doi:10.1007/s44217-025-00602-7 · Cited by 88
Opportunities and challenges of using generative AI to personalize educational assessment
Arslan, B., Lehman, B., Tenison, C., Sparks, J. R., López, A. A., Gu, L., & Zapata-Rivera, D. (2024) · Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.3389/frai.2024.1460651 · Cited by 52
Metadata
- Authors
- Bernacki, M. L., Greene, M. J., & Lobczowski, N. G.
- Venue
- Educational Psychology Review
- Published
- 2021-04-27
- Volume
- 33
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1675-1715
- ISSN
- 1040-726X (ISSN-L)
- 1573-336X
- OpenAlex
- W3159409425
- Cited by
- 455
- References
- 94
- FWCI
- 10.23
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Systematic Review of Research on Personalized Learning: Personalized by Whom, to What, How, and for What Purpose(s)? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/s10648-021-09615-8
- The paper
- Bernacki, M. L., Greene, M. J., & Lobczowski, N. G. (2021). A Systematic Review of Research on Personalized Learning: Personalized by Whom, to What, How, and for What Purpose(s)? Educational Psychology Review. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-021-09615-8
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
